Trust Still Lives In Blue Links

I’ve been extraordinarily antsy to publish this research. Take into account it the AIO Usability research 1.5, with new insights. You additionally need to keep tuned for our first AI Mode usability research! It’s coming in a number of weeks (make certain to subscribe to not miss it).

Increase your abilities with Progress Memo’s weekly skilled insights. Subscribe at no cost!

Since March, everybody’s been asking the identical query: “Are AI Overviews killing our conversions?”

Our 2025 usability research provides a clearer reply than the recent takes you’ll see on LinkedIn and X (Twitter).

In Might 2025, I revealed important findings from the primary complete UX research of AI Overviews (AIOs). In the present day, I’m presenting you with new insights from that research based mostly on a cutting-edge RAG system that analyzed over 100,000 phrases of transcription.

Probably the most important, stand-out discovering from that research: Individuals use AI Overviews to get oriented and save time.

Then, for any search that entails a transaction or high-stakes decision-making, searchers validate outdoors Google, often with trusted manufacturers or authority domains.

Internet-net: AIO is a preview layer. Blue hyperlinks nonetheless shut. Earlier than we dive in, it’s essential hear these insights from Garrett French, CEO of Xofu, who financed this research:

“What lit me up most from this newest work from Kevin: We’ve got direct perception now into an “anchor sample” of AIO conduct.

On this usability research, we found that customers not often voice mistrust of AI Overviews straight – as an alternative they hesitate, refine, or click on out.

Due to this fact, hesitation itself is the loudest sign to us.

We see the identical in advanced, transition-enabling purchase-committee shopping for (B2B and B2C): Procurement stalls with out lifecycle readability, engineer stall with out specs, IT stalls with out validation.

These aren’t complaints. They’re unresolved, unanswered, and even unknown questions which have NEVER proven themselves in KW demand.

As content material entrepreneurs, we now have by no means held ourselves systematically accountable to answering them.

Customer support logs – for instance of 1 floor for locating friction – expose the identical hesitations in traceable kind by way of repeated chats, escalations, deployment blocks, and many others.

Customer support logs are one floor; AIOs are one other.

However the actual supply of reality is all the time contextual viewers friction.

Answering these “friction-inducing, unasked latent questions give us a method to learn these alerts and design content material that actually strikes choices ahead.

What The Research Really Discovered:

• Natural outcomes are essentially the most trusted and most constantly profitable vacation spot throughout duties.
• Sponsored outcomes are observed however actively skipped as a result of low belief.
• In-SERP solutions rapidly resolved roughly 85% of easy factual questions.
• Customers typically use AIO as a preview or shortcut, then click on out to complete or validate (on model websites, YouTube, coupon portals, and the like).
• Buying carousels assist discovery greater than closure. Count on reassessment clicks.
• Belief splits by stakes: Low-stakes search journeys typically finish within the AIO, whereas finance or well being pushes folks to recognized authorities like PayPal, NIH, or Mayo Clinic.
• Age and system matter. Youthful customers, particularly on smartphones, settle for AIOs quicker; older cohorts favor blue hyperlinks and authority domains.
• When the AIO is mistaken or feels generic, folks bail. We logged 12 distinctive “AIO is deceptive/mistaken” flags in higher-stakes contexts.

(Taken with diving deeper into the primary findings from this research or want a refresher? Learn the primary full iteration of the UX research of AIOs.)

Why This Issues For The Backside Line

In my earlier evaluation, I argued that top-of-funnel visibility had extra downstream influence than our advertising analytics ever credited. I additionally argued that demand doesn’t simply disappear as a result of clicks shrink.

This research’s conduct patterns assist that: AIO satisfies fast lookup intent, however buy intent nonetheless routes by way of exterior validation and model belief – aka clicks. Individuals on this research shared ideas aloud, like:

• “There’s the AI outcomes, however I’d slightly go straight to PayPal’s personal web site.”
• “Mayo Clinic on the prime of outcomes, that’s the place I’d go. I belief Mayo Clinic greater than an AI abstract.”

And that preserves downstream conversions (while you present up in the best locations and have earned authority).

Deeper Insights: Secondary Findings You Want To See

Not too long ago, I labored with Eric Van Buskirk (the analysis director of the research) and his workforce over at Clickstream Options to do a deeper evaluation of the Might 2025 findings.

Utilizing a complicated RAG-driven AI system, we analyzed all 91,559 (!) phrases of the transcripts from recorded consumer periods throughout 275 activity cases.

That is essential to know: We have been capable of finding new insights from this research as a result of Eric has constructed cutting-edge know-how.

Our new RAG system analyzes structured fields like SERP Options, AIO satisfaction, or consumer reactions from transcriptions and annotations. It creates a retrieval layer and makes use of ChatGPT-5 for semantic search.

The result’s quicker, extra rigorous, and extra clear analysis. Each declare could be traced to knowledge rows and transcript quotes, patterns are checked throughout the total dataset, and visible proof is a question away.

(To sum that every one up in plain language: Eric’s custom-built superior RAG-driven AI system is wildly cool and intensely efficient.)

Sensible advantages:

• Auditable insights: Conclusions map again to precise knowledge slices.
• Pace: Check a speculation in minutes as an alternative of re-reading periods.
• Scale: Triangulate transcripts, coded fields, and outcomes throughout all contributors.
• Match for the AI period: Clear construction and reliable alerts mirror how retrieval techniques decide sources, which aligns with our broader stance on visibility and belief.

Right here’s what we discovered:

1. The information verified 4 distinct AIO Intent Patterns.
2. Key SERP options drove extra engagement than others.
3. Core manufacturers form belief in AIOs.

About The New RAG System

We rebuilt the evaluation on a retrieval-augmented system so solutions come from the research knowledge, not mannequin guesswork. The spine lives on structured fields with full transcripts and annotations, listed in a light-weight database and paired with bucketed knowledge for cohort filtering and cross-checks.

Core elements:

• Dataset ingestion and cleansing.
• Retrieval layer based mostly on hybrid key phrase + semantic search.
• Auto-coded sentiment to show speech into constant, queryable alerts.
• Validation loop to reduce hallucination.

The result’s quicker, extra rigorous, and extra clear analysis. Each declare could be traced to rows and quotes, patterns are checked throughout the total dataset, and visible proof is a question away.

Sensible advantages:

• Map conclusions again to precise knowledge slices.
• Check a speculation in minutes.
• Triangulate transcripts, coded fields, and outcomes throughout all contributors.
• Clear construction and reliable alerts.

Which AIO Intent Patterns Have been Verified Via The Knowledge

One of many largest secondary findings from the AIO usability research is that the AIO Intent Patterns aren’t simply “intestine emotions” anymore – they’re statistically validated, constructed from measurable conduct.

Earlier than a few of you roll your eyes and annoyingly declare “right here’s yet one more newly created search engine optimization/advertising buzzword,” the patterns we found within the knowledge weren’t precisely search personas, and so they weren’t precisely search intents, both.

Due to this fact, we’re utilizing the phrase “AIO Intent Sample” to differentiate these ideas from each other.

Right here’s how I outline AIO Intent Patterns: AIO Intent Patterns signify statistically validated clusters of consumer conduct – like dwell, scroll, refinements, and sentiment – that outline how folks reply to AIOs. They’re recurring, measurable behaviors that describe how folks work together with AI Overviews, whether or not they settle for, validate, examine, or reject them.

And, once more, these patterns aren’t precisely search intents or queries, however they’re not precisely consumer profiles both.

As an alternative, these patterns signify a set of behaviors (that appeared all through our knowledge) carried out by customers to validate AIOs in several and distinct methods. In order that’s why we’ve known as the person behavioral patterns “validations” under.

By operating a RAG-driven coding move throughout 250+ activity cases, we have been capable of quantify 4 totally different behavioral patterns of engagement with AIOs:

1. Effectivity-first validations that reward clear, extractable details (accepting of AIOs).
2. Belief-driven validations that convert solely with credibility (validate AIOs).
3. Comparative validations that use AIOs however examine with a number of sources.
4. Skeptical rejections that robotically mistrust AIOs for high-stakes queries.

What issues most right here is that these aren’t arbitrary labels.

Statistical exams confirmed the variations in dwell time, scrolling, and refinements between the 4 teams have been far too giant to be random.

To place it plainly: These are actual AIO use behavioral segments or AIO use intents you’ll be able to plan for.

Let’s have a look at each.

1. Effectivity-First Validations

These are validations the place customers intend to hunt a shortcut. Customers dip into AIOs for quick reality lookups, skim for one reply, and transfer on.

Effectivity-driven validations thrive on content material that’s concise, scannable, and fact-rich. Typical queries which might be resolved straight within the AIO embrace:

• “1 cup in ml”
• “the right way to take a screenshot on Mac”
• “UTC to CET converter”
• “what’s robots.txt”
• “electronic mail regex instance”

Under, you’ll be able to try two examples of “efficiency-first validation” activity actions from the research.

“Okay, so I just like the abstract on the prime. And I’d go forward and comply with these directions and solely come again to a search in the event that they didn’t work.”

“I simply needed to go straight to the AI overview… and I appreciated that reply. It gave me the knowledge I wanted, organized and clear. Discovered it.”

Our knowledge reveals a median dwell time of simply 14 seconds for this group total, with virtually no scrolling or refinements.

Customers which have an efficiency-first intent for his or her queries have a impartial to optimistic sentiment towards AIOs – with no hesitation flags – as a result of AIOs scratch the efficiency-intent itch rapidly.

For this behavioral sample, the AIO typically is the ultimate reply – particularly on cellular – and in the event that they do click on, it’s often the primary clear, extractable supply.

👉 Optimization ideas for this validation group:

• Compress key details into crisp TLDRs, FAQs, and schema so AIO can floor them.
• Place definitions, checklists, and instance blocks close to the highest of your web page.
• Use easy tables and step lists that may be lifted cleanly.
• Guarantee model mentions and key details seem excessive on the web page for visibility.

2. Belief-Pushed Validations

These validations are filled with warning. Customers with trust-driven intents interact with AIOs however not often cease there.

They’ll skim the overview, hesitate, after which click on out to an authority area to validate what they noticed, like on this instance under:

The consumer shares that “…on the prime, it gave me a very good description on the right way to switch cash. However I nonetheless clicked the PayPal hyperlink as a result of it was straight from the official web site. That’s what I went with – I belief that info to be extra correct.”

Typical queries that set off this validation sample embrace:

• “PayPal purchaser safety guidelines”
• “Mayo Clinic strep signs”
• “Is creatine secure long run”
• “Stripe refund timeline”
• “GDPR consent necessities instance”

And our knowledge from the research verifies customers scroll extra (2.7x on common), dwell longer (~57s), and infrequently flag uncertainty in trust-driven mode. What they need is authority.

These customers have a excessive fee of hesitation flags of their search experiments. Their sentiment is combined – typically impartial, typically anxious or pissed off – and their confidence is barely medium to low.

For these searches, the AIO is a place to begin, not the vacation spot. They’ll click on out to Mayo Clinic, PayPal, Stripe, or different trusted domains to validate.

👉 Optimization ideas for this validation group:

• Reinforce belief scaffolding in your touchdown pages: skilled reviewers, citations, and last-reviewed dates.
• Mirror official terminology and hyperlink to major sources.
• Add “What to do subsequent” bins that align with authority steering.
• Construct robust E-E-A-T alerts since credibility is the conversion lever right here.

3. Comparative Validations

This search intent actively leans into the AIO for traditional comparative queries (assume “Ahrefs vs Semrush for content material groups”) to satisfy their search intent OR to match informational assets to get readability on the “finest” of one thing; they broaden, scroll, refine, and use interactive options – however they don’t cease there.

As an alternative, they discover throughout a number of sources, hopping to YouTube evaluations, Reddit threads, and vendor websites earlier than making a call.

Instance queries that reveal AIO comparative validation conduct:

• “Notion vs Obsidian for groups”
• “Finest mirrorless digital camera underneath 1000”
• “Methods to change a motorcycle tire”
• “Standing desk advantages vs dangers”
• “Programmatic search engine optimization examples B2B”
• “Methods to set up a nest thermostat”

Right here’s an instance utilizing a “the right way to” search, the place the consumer is evaluating sources for the finest method to obtain essentially the most correct info:

“The AI Overview gave me clear step-by-step directions that matched what I anticipated. However because it was a bodily DIY activity, I nonetheless most well-liked to department out to observe a video for affirmation.”

On common, searchers searching for comparative validations within the AIO dwell for 45+ seconds, scroll 4-5 instances, and infrequently open a number of tabs.

Their AIO sentiment is optimistic, and their confidence is excessive, however they nonetheless need to examine.

If this feels acquainted – like traditional transactional or industrial search intents – it’s as a result of it’s associated.

When you’ve been doing search engine optimization for any time, it’s possible you’ve created a few of these “versus” or “comparability” pages. You even have possible created “the right way to” content material with step-by-step how-to steering, like the right way to set up a flatscreen TV in your wall.

Earlier than AIOs, your goal customers would discover themselves there in case you ranked nicely in search.

However now, the AIO frames the panorama first, and the choice comes after weighing professionals and cons throughout info sources to search out the most effective resolution.

👉 Optimization ideas for this validation group:

• Publish structured comparability pages with choice tables and use-case breakdowns.
• Pair every web page with brief demo movies, social proof, and credible neighborhood posts to echo your takeaways.
• Embody “Who it’s for” and “Who it isn’t for” sections to cut back ambiguity.
• Seed content material in YouTube and boards that AIOs (and customers) can decide up.

4. Skeptical Rejections

Searchers with a make-or-break intent? They’re the outright AIO skeptical rejectors.

When stakes are excessive – well being, finance, or authorized … the standard YMYL (Your Cash, Your Life) stuff – they don’t belief AIO to get it proper.

Customers might scan the abstract briefly, however they rapidly transfer to authoritative sources like authorities websites, hospitals, or monetary establishments.

Widespread queries the place this rejection sample reveals up:

• “Metformin dosage for PCOS”
• “Methods to file taxes as a freelancer in Germany”
• “Bank card chargeback rights EU”
• “Toddler fever when to go to ER”
• “LLC vs GmbH authorized legal responsibility”

For this search intent, the dwell time in an AIO is brief or nonexistent, and their sentiment typically skews unfavourable.

They present dedication to bypass the AI layer in favor of direct authority validation.

👉 Optimization ideas for this validation group:

• Prioritize citations and mentions from extremely trusted domains so AIOs lean on you not directly.
• Align your pages with the language and classes utilized by official sources.
• Add specific disclaimers and clear subheadings to strengthen authority alerts.
• For YMYL matters, give attention to being cited slightly than surfaced as the ultimate reply.

SERP Options That Drove Engagement

Our RAG AI-driven system of the usability knowledge verified that not all SERP options are created equal.

Once we reduce the information all the way down to solely options with significant engagement – which our research outlined as ≥5 seconds of dwell time throughout at the least 10 cases – solely 4 SERP options findings stood out.

(I’ll offer you a second to take a number of wild guesses relating to the outcomes … and then you definately’ll see in case you’re proper.)

Drumroll please. 🥁🥁🥁

(Okay, second over. Right here we go.)

1. Natural Outcomes Are Nonetheless The Spine

Each time our research contributors gave the traditional blue hyperlinks greater than a passing look, they virtually all the time discovered success.

Transcripts from the research make it specific: Customers trusted official websites, authorities domains, and acquainted authority manufacturers, as one participant’s quote demonstrates:

“Mayo Clinic on the prime of outcomes, that’s the place I’d go. I belief Mayo Clinic greater than an AI abstract.”

What about social or neighborhood websites that confirmed up within the natural blue-link outcomes?

Reddit and YouTube have been the social or neighborhood platforms discovered within the SERP that have been talked about most by research contributors.

Reddit had 45 distinctive mentions throughout the whole research. Total, seeing a Reddit lead to natural outcomes produces a consumer sentiment that’s principally optimistic, with some customers feeling impartial towards the inclusion of Reddit in search, and only a few unfavourable feedback about Reddit outcomes.

YouTube had 20 distinctive mentions throughout the whole research. The sentiment towards YouTube inclusion in SERP outcomes was overwhelmingly optimistic (19 out of 20 of these cases had a optimistic consumer sentiment). The feelings flagged from the research contributors round YouTube outcomes included comfortable/glad or curious/exploring.

There was a really clear theme throughout the research that appeared when social or neighborhood websites popped up in natural outcomes:

• Reddit was invoked when contributors needed neighborhood perspective, often compared duties. Confidence was excessive as a result of Reddit validated nuance, however AIO belief was weak (customers bypassed AIOs to Reddit as an alternative).
• YouTube was used as a visible validator, particularly in product or technical comparability duties. Customers expressed optimistic sentiment and excessive satisfaction, even when specific belief wasn’t verbalized. They handled YouTube as a pure step after the AIOs/natural SERP outcomes.

2. Sponsored Outcomes Barely Register

Individuals noticed them, however not often acted on them. “I don’t like going to sponsored websites” was a typical chorus.

Excessive visibility, however low belief.

3. Buying Carousels Help Discovery However Not Closure.

Individuals clicked into Buying carousels for product concepts, however typically bounced again out to reassess with exterior websites.

The carousel works as a catalog – not a better.

4. Featured Snippets Proceed To Punch Above Their Weight

For easy factual lookups, Snippets had an ~85% success fee of engagement.

They have been environment friendly and last for fact-based queries like [example] and [example].

⚠️ Essential observe: Regardless that Google is changing Featured Snippets with AIOs, it’s clear that this methodology of receiving info inside the SERP has a excessive engagement. Whereas the SERP function could also be within the technique of being discontinued, the information reveals customers like participating with snippets. The takeaway right here is that in case you have been typically showing for featured snippets and you’re now typically showing for AIO citations, sustain the great work to proceed incomes visibility there, as a result of it nonetheless issues.

SERP Options x AIO Intent Patterns

Once you maintain the intent sample layers in thoughts with totally different persona teams, it makes the search behaviors sharper:

• Youthful customers on cellular leaned closely on AIO and snippets, typically stopping there if the stakes have been low. → That’s the hallmark of efficiency-first validations (fast reality lookups) and comparative validations (scrolling, refining, and treating AIO as the primary lens).
• Older customers constantly bypassed AI components in favor of natural authority outcomes. → That is traditional conduct for trust-driven validations, when customers click on out to manufacturers like PayPal or the Mayo Clinic, and skeptical rejections, when customers mistrust AIO altogether for high-stakes duties.
• Transactional queries – cash, well being, reserving – almost all the time pushed folks towards trusted manufacturers, no matter what AIO or advertisements surfaced. → This connects on to trust-driven validations (customers who want authority reinforcement to satisfy their search intent) and skeptical rejections (customers who reject AIO in YMYL contexts as a result of AIOs don’t meet the intent behind the conduct).

What this reveals is that, for SEOs, the precedence isn’t about chasing each function and “successful all of them.”

Take this for instance:

“The AI overview didn’t pop up, so I used the search outcomes. These have been principally bizarre web sites, however CNBC regarded reliable. They’d a comparability of various platforms like CardCash and GCX, so I went with CNBC as a result of they’re a trusted supply.”

Your job is to match intent (as all the time):

• Earn extractable presence in AIOs for fast details,
• Reinforce belief scaffolding on authority-driven natural pages, and
• Deal with Buying and Sponsored slots as visibility and consciousness performs slightly than conversion levers.

Which Manufacturers Formed Belief In AIOs

AIOs don’t stand on their very own; they borrow credibility from the manufacturers they floor – whether or not you prefer it or not.

(Google really appears to be cannibalizing itself whereas devouring all of us, too.)

When contributors validated or rejected an AI reply, it typically hinged on whether or not a well-recognized or authoritative model was talked about.

Our RAG-coded research knowledge surfaced clear winners:

• Institutional authorities like PayPal, NIH, and authorities websites constantly formed belief, even with out clicks.
• Ecommerce and retail giants (Amazon, Walmart, Groupon) carried optimistic associations from model familiarity.
• Monetary and tax prep providers (H&R Block, Jackson Hewitt, CPA mentions) have been trusted anchors in transactional searches.
• Automotive rental manufacturers (Funds, Avis, Greenback, Kayak, Zipcar, Turo) dominated travel-related duties.
• Rising platforms (Elevate, CardCash, GameFlip, Kade Pay) gained traction primarily as a result of an AIO surfaced them, not due to prior consciousness.

👉 Why it issues: Model belief is the glue between AIO publicity and consumer motion.

Right here’s a fast paraphrase of this consumer’s exploration: We’re searching for locations to promote reward playing cards for fast cost. Platforms like Elevate, Reward Card Granny, or CardCash come up. On CardCash, I attempted a $10 7-Eleven card, and the supply was $8.30. In order that they ‘tax’ you for promoting. That’s good to know – however it reveals you’ll be able to promote reward playing cards for money, and CardCash is one possibility.

On this occasion, the AIO surfaced CardCash. The consumer didn’t learn about it earlier than this search. They explored it intimately, however belief friction (“they tax you”) formed whether or not they’d really use it.

For SEOs, this implies three performs operating in tandem:

1. Win mentions in AIOs by guaranteeing your content material is structured, scannable, and extractable.
2. Strengthen authority off-site so when customers validate (or reject the AIO), they land in your pages with confidence.
3. Construct topical authority in your area of interest by way of complete persona-based subject protection and invaluable info acquire throughout your matters. (This generally is a highly effective entry level or alternative for groups competing towards bigger manufacturers.)

What does this all imply to your personal tactical optimizations?

However right here’s essentially the most essential factor to remove from this evaluation right now:

With this info in thoughts, now you can go to your stakeholders and information them to take a look at all of your prompts, queries, and matters with recent eyes.

That you must decide:

• Which of the goal queries/matters are fast solutions?
• Which of the goal queries/matters are cases the place folks want extra belief and assurance?
• When do your very best customers count on to discover extra, based mostly on the goal queries/matters?

This can provide help to set expectations accordingly and measure success over time.

Featured Picture: Paulo Bobita/Search Engine Journal