Web Almanac Data Reveals CMS Plugins Are Setting Technical SEO Standards

If greater than half the net runs on a content material administration system, then the vast majority of technical Web optimization requirements are being positively formed earlier than an Web optimization even begins work on it. That’s the lens I took into the 2025 Net Almanac Web optimization chapter (for readability, I co-authored the 2025 Net Almanac Web optimization chapter referenced on this article).

Relatively than asking how particular person optimization selections affect efficiency, I needed to know one thing extra basic: How a lot of the net’s technical Web optimization baseline is set by CMS defaults and the ecosystems round them.

Web optimization usually feels intensely hands-on – maybe an excessive amount of so. We debate canonical logic, structured information implementation, crawl management, and metadata configuration as if every website had been a bespoke engineering mission. However when 50%+ of pages within the HTTP Archive dataset sit on CMS platforms, these platforms grow to be the invisible standard-setters. Their defaults, constraints, and have rollouts quietly outline what “regular” appears to be like like at scale.

This piece explores that affect utilizing 2025 Net Almanac and HTTP Archive information, particularly:

• How CMS adoption developments monitor with core technical Web optimization alerts.
• The place plugin ecosystems seem to form implementation patterns.
• And the way rising requirements like llms.txt are spreading because of this.

The query will not be whether or not SEOs matter. It’s whether or not we’ve been underestimating who units the baseline for the trendy net.

The Spine Of Net Design

The 2025 CMS chapter of the Net Almanac noticed a milestone hit with CMS adoption; over 50% of pages are on CMSs. In case you had been unsold on how a lot of the net is carried by CMSs, over 50% of 16 million web sites is a big quantity.

With regard to which CMSs are the most well-liked, this once more might not be shocking, however it’s value reflecting on with regard to which has probably the most affect.

WordPress continues to be probably the most used CMS, by a great distance, even when it has dropped marginally within the 2024 information. Shopify, Wix, Squarespace, and Joomla path a great distance behind, however they nonetheless have a big affect, particularly Shopify, on ecommerce particularly.

Web optimization Features That Ship As Defaults In CMS Platforms

CMS platform defaults are necessary, this – I imagine – is that a number of fundamental technical Web optimization requirements are both default setups or for the comparatively small variety of web sites which have devoted SEOs or individuals who at the very least construct to/work with Web optimization greatest apply.

Once we speak about “greatest apply,” we’re on barely shaky floor for some, as there isn’t a common, prescriptive view on this one, however I’d take into account:

• Descriptive “Web optimization-friendly” URLs.
• Editable title and meta description.
• XML sitemaps.
• Canonical tags.
• Meta robots directive altering.
• Structured information – at the very least a fundamental degree.
• Robots.txt modifying.

Of the primary CMS platforms, here’s what they – self-reportedly – have as “default.” Observe: For some platforms – like Shopify – they’d say they’re Web optimization-friendly (and to be sincere, it’s “ok”), however many SEOs would argue that they’re not pleasant sufficient to go this take a look at. I’m not weighing into these nuances, however I’d say each Shopify and people SEOs make some good factors.

Based mostly on the above, I’d say that almost all Web optimization fundamentals could be coated by most CMSs “out of the field.” Whether or not they work properly for you, otherwise you can’t obtain the actual configuration that your particular circumstances require, are two different necessary questions – ones which I’m not taking over. Nonetheless, it usually comes down to those factors:

1. It’s potential for these platforms for use badly.
2. It’s potential that the enterprise logic you want will break/not work with the above.
3. There are many extra superior Web optimization options that aren’t out of the field, which are simply as necessary.

We’re speaking about foundations right here, however after I replicate on what shipped as “default” 15+ years in the past, progress has been made.

Fingerprints Of Defaults In The HTTP Archive Information

On condition that a number of CMSs ship with these requirements, do these Web optimization defaults correlate with CMS adoption? In some ways, sure. Let’s discover this within the HTTP Archive information.

Canonical Tag Adoption Correlates With CMS

Combining canonical tag adoption information with (all) CMS adoption over the past 4 years, we are able to see that for each cellular and desktop, the developments appear to comply with one another fairly carefully.

Operating a easy Pearson correlation over these components, we are able to see this sturdy correlation even clearer, with canonical tag implementation and the presence of self-canonical URLs.

What differs is the cellular correlation of canonicalized URLs; that appears to be a damaging correlation on cellular and a decrease (however nonetheless optimistic) correlation on desktop. A drop in canonicalized pages is basically inflicting this damaging correlation, and the explanations behind this might be many (and more durable to make sure of).

Canonical tags are a vital ingredient for technical Web optimization; their continued adoption does actually appear to trace the expansion in CMS use, too.

Schema.org Information Sorts Correlate With CMS

Schema.org sorts towards CMS adoption present related developments, however are much less definitive general. There are lots of several types of Schema.org, but when we plot CMS adoption towards those commonest to Web optimization issues, we are able to observe a broadly rising image.

Apart from Schema.org WebSite, we are able to see CMS progress and structured information following related developments.

However we should notice that Schema.org adoption is sort of significantly decrease than CMSs general. This might be because of most CMS defaults being far much less complete with Schema.org. Once we take a look at particular CMS examples (shortly), we’ll see far-stronger hyperlinks.

Schema.org implementation continues to be principally intentional, specialist, and never as widespread because it might be. If I had been a search engine or creating an AI Search software, would I depend on common adoption of those, seeing the info like this? Presumably not.

Robots.txt

On condition that robots.txt is a single file that has some agreed requirements behind it, its implementation is way less complicated, so we might anticipate increased ranges of adoption than Schema.org.

The presence of a robots.txt is fairly necessary, principally to restrict crawl of search engines like google to particular areas of the location. We’re beginning to see an evolution – we famous within the 2025 Net Almanac Web optimization chapter – that the robots.txt is used much more as a governance piece, quite than simply housekeeping. A key signal that we’re utilizing our key instruments in another way within the AI search world.

However earlier than we take into account the extra superior implementations, how a lot of an element does a CMS have in making certain a robots.txt is current? Seems to be like over the past 4 years, CMS platforms are driving a big quantity extra of robots.txt recordsdata serving a 200 response:

What’s extra curious, nevertheless, is when you think about the file of the robots.txt recordsdata. Non-CMS platforms have robots.txt recordsdata which are considerably bigger.

Why might this be? Are they extra superior in non-CMS platforms, longer recordsdata, extra bespoke guidelines? Likely in some instances, however we’re lacking one other affect of a CMSs requirements – compliant (legitimate) robots.txt recordsdata.

Plenty of robots.txt recordsdata serve a legitimate 200 response, however usually they’re not txt recordsdata, or they’re redirecting to 404 pages or related. Once we restrict this checklist to solely recordsdata that include user-agent declarations (as a proxy), we see a unique story.

Approaching 14% of robots.txt recordsdata served on non-CMS platforms are possible not even robots.txt recordsdata.

A robots.txt is straightforward to arrange, however it’s a acutely aware resolution. If it’s forgotten/missed, it merely received’t exist. A CMS makes it extra more likely to have a robots.txt, and what’s extra, when it’s in place, it makes it simpler to handle/preserve – which IS key.

WordPress Particular Defaults

CMS platforms, it appears, cowl the fundamentals, however extra superior choices – which nonetheless should be defaults – usually want further Web optimization instruments to allow.

Interrogating WordPress-specific websites with the HTTP Archive information will probably be best as we get the biggest pattern, and the Wapalizer information offers a dependable method to decide the affect of WordPress-specific Web optimization instruments.

From the Net Almanac, we are able to see which Web optimization instruments are probably the most put in on WordPress websites.

For anybody working inside Web optimization, that is unlikely to be shocking. In case you are an Web optimization and labored on WordPress, there’s a excessive likelihood you could have used both of the highest three. What IS value contemplating proper now could be that whereas Yoast Web optimization is by far probably the most prevalent throughout the information, it’s seen on barely over 15% of websites. Even the most well-liked Web optimization plugin on the most well-liked CMS continues to be a comparatively small share.

Of those prime three plugins, let’s first take into account what the variations of their “defaults” are. These are much like a few of WordPress’s, however we are able to see many extra superior options that come as normal.

Editable metadata, structured information, robots.txt, sitemaps, and, extra not too long ago, llms.txt are probably the most notable. It’s value noting that a number of the performance is extra “back-end,” so not one thing we’d be as simply capable of see within the HTTP Archive information.

Structured Information Affect From Web optimization Plugins

We are able to see (above) that structured information implementation and CMS adoption do correlate; what’s extra attention-grabbing right here is to know the place the important thing drivers themselves are.

Viewing the HTTP Archive information with a easy phase (Web optimization plugins vs. no Web optimization plugins), from the latest scoring paints a stark image.

Once we restrict the Schema.org @sorts to probably the most related to Web optimization, it’s actually clear that some structured information sorts are pushed actually laborious utilizing Web optimization plugins. They don’t seem to be utterly absent. Individuals could also be utilizing lesser-known plugins or coding their very own options, however ease of implementation is implicit within the information.

Robots Meta Assist

One other discovering from the Web optimization Net Almanac 2025 chapter was that “comply with” and “index” directives had been probably the most prevalent, though they’re technically redundant, as having no meta robots directives is implicitly the identical factor.

Throughout the chapter quantity crunching itself, I didn’t dig in a lot deeper, however realizing that each one main Web optimization WordPress plugins have “index,comply with” as default, I used to be desperate to see if I might make a stronger connection within the information.

The place Web optimization plugins had been current on WordPress, “index, comply with” was set on over 75% of root pages vs.

Given the ubiquity of WordPress and Web optimization plugins, that is possible an enormous contributor to this specific configuration. Whereas that is redundant, it isn’t unsuitable, however it’s – once more – a key instance of whether or not a number of of the primary plugins set up a de facto normal like this, it actually shapes a good portion of the net.

Diving Into LLMs.txt

One other key space of change from the 2025 Net Almanac was the introduction of the llms.txt file. Not an express endorsement of the file, however quite a tacit acknowledgment that this is a vital information level within the AI Search age.

From the 2025 information, simply over 2% of websites had a legitimate llms.txt file and:

• 39.6% of llms.txt recordsdata are associated to All-in-One Web optimization.
• 3.6% of llms.txt recordsdata are associated to Yoast Web optimization.

This isn’t essentially an intentional act by all these concerned, particularly as Rank Math allows this by default (not an opt-in like Yoast and All-in-One Web optimization).

For the reason that first information was gathered on July 25, 2025 if we take a month-by-month view of the info, we are able to see additional progress since. It’s laborious to not see this as rising confidence on this markup OR at the very least, that it’s really easy to allow, extra individuals are possible hedging their bets.

Conclusion

The Net Almanac information means that Web optimization, at a macro degree, strikes much less due to particular person SEOs and extra as a result of WordPress, Shopify, Wix, or a serious plugin ships a default.

• Canonical tags correlate with CMS progress.
• Robots.txt validity improves with CMS governance.
• Redundant “index,comply with” directives proliferate as a result of plugins make them express.
• Even llms.txt is already spreading by plugin toggles earlier than it even will get full consensus.

This doesn’t diminish the affect of Web optimization; it reframes it. Particular person practitioners nonetheless create aggressive benefit, particularly in superior configuration, structure, content material high quality, and enterprise logic. However the baseline state of the net, the technical ground on which all the pieces else is constructed, is more and more set by product groups delivery defaults to tens of millions of websites.

Maybe we should always take into account that if CMSs are the infrastructure layer of recent Web optimization, then plugin creators are de facto requirements setters. They deploy “greatest apply” earlier than it turns into doctrine

That is the way it ought to work, however I’m additionally not completely comfy with this. They normalize implementation and even create new conventions just by making them zero-cost. Requirements which are redundant have the power to endure as a result of they will.

So the query is much less about whether or not CMS platforms affect Web optimization. They clearly do. The extra attention-grabbing query is whether or not we, as SEOs, are paying sufficient consideration to the place these defaults originate, how they evolve, and the way a lot of the net’s “greatest apply” is de facto simply the trail of least resistance shipped at scale.

An Web optimization’s worth shouldn’t be interpreted by the quantity of hours they spend discussing canonical tags, meta robots, and guidelines of sitemap inclusion. This needs to be normal and default. If you wish to have an out-sized affect on Web optimization, foyer an present software, create your personal plugin, or drive curiosity to affect change in a single.

Extra Assets:  

Featured Picture: Prostock-studio/Shutterstock