28 Expert-Level Prompt Examples For SEO

# Jobs-To-Be-Performed Question Map Generator


## System Context
You're a senior buyer analysis strategist with experience in Clayton Christensen's JTBD principle, Tony Ulwick's Final result-Pushed Innovation, and Website positioning content material technique. Your activity is to research subjects by way of genuine buyer job frameworks and translate findings into actionable search question maps.


## Enter Information
**Seed Subject:** [INSERT YOUR SEED TOPIC/KEYWORD]


## Evaluation Framework
Execute this in sequential phases:


### Section 1: Buyer Job Identification

Utilizing JTBD ideas, determine what clients are really attempting to perform once they encounter this matter. Contemplate:
- **Purposeful Jobs:** What sensible activity or downside are they fixing?
- **Emotional Jobs:** What emotions are they attempting to attain or keep away from?
- **Social Jobs:** How do they need to be perceived by others?
- **Progress State of affairs:** What circumstances set off the necessity for progress?



For every job sort, doc:
- The precise progress clients search
- Present resolution inadequacies (struggles)
- Success standards from buyer perspective
- Genuine buyer language (keep away from company jargon)


### Section 2: Search Conduct Translation

Remodel recognized jobs into precise search patterns. Reference how clients naturally specific issues versus how corporations describe options. Contemplate informational, navigational, industrial, and transactional search intents.



For every buyer job, generate:
- 3-5 particular search queries clients would really sort
- Downside-focused vs. solution-focused question variations
- Lengthy-tail variations reflecting totally different buyer sophistication ranges
- Associated "jobs-to-be-done" key phrases (how you can, methods to, can I, ought to I)


### Section 3: Funnel Stage Mapping

Map every question to the advertising and marketing funnel stage the place clients usually seek for this info. Contemplate that JTBD queries usually seize middle-funnel site visitors with excessive shopping for intent.



Categorize queries by stage:
- **Consciousness:** Downside recognition and job definition
- **Consideration:** Resolution analysis and strategy comparability  
- **Determination:** Implementation confidence and supplier choice
- **Retention:** Worth maximization and job enlargement


### Section 4: Content material Technique Growth

Advocate content material sorts that greatest serve every buyer job and search intent, specializing in instructional worth that progressively introduces options quite than direct promotion.



## Output Format


Create a complete desk with these columns:
| Buyer Job | Job Kind | Genuine Buyer Language | Instance Search Queries | Search Intent | Funnel Stage | Content material Kind Advice | Precedence Rating |


### Further Evaluation Required:
1. **Job Prioritization Matrix:** Rank jobs by frequency and enterprise impression
2. **Content material Hole Evaluation:** Establish underserved buyer jobs
3. **Aggressive Job Mapping:** Be aware how opponents tackle these jobs
4. **Implementation Roadmap:** Sequence content material creation by strategic worth


## High quality Verification
Earlier than finalizing output, confirm:
-  Buyer language displays precise downside expressions, not product descriptions
-  Search queries symbolize genuine search habits patterns
-  Content material suggestions serve buyer progress, not simply Website positioning metrics
-  Funnel mapping displays real looking buyer journey development
-  Job definitions deal with buyer outcomes, not product options


## Success Metrics
Consider suggestions in opposition to:
- **Job Completion Effectiveness:** How effectively does content material assist clients make progress?
- **Search Intent Alignment:** Do queries match precise buyer search patterns?
- **Content material Utility Rating:** Would clients discover this genuinely useful?
- **Certified Engagement Potential:** Probability of attracting ready-to-buy site visitors


Generate your evaluation following every part sequentially. **Give attention to delivering the desk as your main output - preserve evaluation inner and current solely the ultimate actionable outcomes.**

## Complete Question Fan-Out Immediate: Patent-Aligned Algorithm Implementation


### Understanding Question Fan-Out: The Technical Framework


Question fan-out is a classy multi-stage course of the place search engines like google decompose a person's question by way of a number of algorithmic steps:


### Enter Necessities
1. **Main Question**: [schema, schema seo, json ld schema] 
2. **Consumer Context**: [Beginner/Intermediate/Expert | Industry | Geographic location]
3. **Enterprise Goal**: [Information | Transaction | Navigation | Investigation] 


1. **Preliminary Question Decomposition**: The system identifies the core semantic elements and entities throughout the question
2. **Thematic Clustering**: Elements are grouped into distinct themes based mostly on semantic relationships
3. **Hierarchical Enlargement**: Every theme generates sub-themes and associated ideas in a tree construction
4. **Contextual Rewriting**: Queries are reformulated based mostly on person context and implicit intent 
5. **Entity Disambiguation**: The system maps question elements to Information Graph entities
6. **Rating and Filtering**: Generated queries are scored and filtered based mostly on relevance alerts


### Detailed Question Fan-Out Algorithm


#### Stage 1: Question Decomposition & Entity Recognition


**Break the question into semantic elements:**
- **Entities**: Establish all named entities (individuals, locations, merchandise, ideas)
- **Attributes**: Extract descriptive properties (dimension, coloration, high quality, temporal)
- **Relationships**: Map connections between entities (comparisons, dependencies, hierarchies)
- **Actions/Intents**: Establish verbs and implied actions


Instance: "greatest sustainable advertising and marketing methods for small e-commerce"
- Entities: [marketing strategies, e-commerce]
- Attributes: [best, sustainable, small]
- Relationships: [strategies FOR e-commerce]
- Intent: [evaluation/selection]


#### Stage 2: Thematic Clustering with Semantic Boundaries


**Generate 3-5 main themes the place every theme:**
- Represents a definite informational side
- Has outlined semantic boundaries (what's included/excluded)
- Accommodates a "centroid" idea (most consultant ingredient)
- Consists of "peripheral" ideas (boundary components)


**Theme Era Guidelines:**
1. Every theme should tackle a special person want
2. Themes ought to have 30-70% semantic overlap with seed question
3. Create each "convergent" themes (narrowing focus) and "divergent" themes (broadening scope)


#### Stage 3: Hierarchical Question Tree Development


For every theme, construct a question tree with these ranges:


**Degree 1 - Root Queries** (Direct theme illustration)
- Most common type of the theme
- Instance: "sustainable advertising and marketing strategies"


**Degree 2 - Facet Queries** (Particular aspects)
- Break root into 3-4 distinct features
- Instance: "environmental impression of digital advertising and marketing"


**Degree 3 - Element Queries** (Granular questions)
- Particular, actionable queries
- Instance: "carbon footprint of e mail campaigns calculation"


**Degree 4 - Context Queries** (Situational variations)
- Modified by person context
- Instance: "e mail carbon footprint for B2B SaaS corporations"


#### Stage 4: Question Rewriting Mechanisms


Apply these rewriting patterns to every base question:


**1. Lexical Substitution**
- Change phrases with synonyms/associated phrases
- "methods" → "techniques", "approaches", "strategies"


**2. Structural Reformulation**
- Assertion → Query: "sustainable advertising and marketing" → "what makes advertising and marketing sustainable?"
- Broad → Particular: "advertising and marketing methods" → "content material advertising and marketing methods"
- Summary → Concrete: "greatest practices" → "step-by-step information"


**3. Intent Transformation**
- Data → Motion: "what's X" → "how you can implement X"
- Normal → Comparative: "good methods" → "X vs Y methods"
- Single → A number of: "greatest technique" → "high 5 methods"


**4. Contextual Augmentation**
- Add temporal context: "...in 2024", "...post-COVID"
- Add experience degree: "...for novices", "...superior strategies"
- Add business particular: "...for SaaS", "...in healthcare"


#### Stage 5: Entity-Primarily based Enlargement


**Information Graph Integration:**
1. Map every entity to its information graph node
2. Retrieve associated entities (guardian, baby, sibling relationships)
3. Extract entity attributes and properties
4. Generate queries combining entities and attributes


**Entity Relationship Patterns:**
- **Hierarchical**: broader/narrower phrases
- **Associative**: generally co-occurring entities
- **Comparative**: related entities for comparability
- **Compositional**: part-whole relationships


#### Stage 6: Scoring and Rating


**Apply multi-factor scoring to every generated question:**


```
Precedence Rating = (0.30 × Semantic Relevance) + 
                 (0.25 × Intent Alignment) + 
                 (0.20 × Subject Protection) + 
                 (0.15 × Consumer Context Match) + 
                 (0.10 × Question Uniqueness)
```


**The place:**
- Semantic Relevance: Cosine similarity to seed question
- Intent Alignment: Match to specified person intent
- Subject Protection: How a lot new info it provides
- Consumer Context Match: Relevance to person's experience/business
- Question Uniqueness: Inverse of overlap with different queries


### Output Format


Generate a hierarchical construction displaying the whole fan-out:


```
SEED QUERY: [Original Query]
│
├── THEME 1: [Theme Name]
│   ├── Centroid: [Most representative query]
│   ├── Root Question: [Level 1]
│   │   ├── Facet 1: [Level 2]
│   │   │   ├── Element Question 1: [Level 3]
│   │   │   │   └── Context Variation: [Level 4]
│   │   │   └── Element Question 2: [Level 3]
│   │   └── Facet 2: [Level 2]
│   │       └── Element Question: [Level 3]
│   └── Entity Expansions:
│       ├── Associated Entity 1: [Query]
│       └── Associated Entity 2: [Query]
│
├── THEME 2: [Theme Name]
│   └── [Similar structure]
```


### Detailed Output Desk


| Theme | Question Degree | Question Textual content | Intent Kind | Entity Focus | Semantic Distance | Precedence Rating | Reasoning |
|-------|------------|------------|-------------|--------------|-------------------|----------------|-----------|
| [Theme] | [L1/L2/L3/L4] | [Query] | [Intent] | [Entities] | [0-1 score] | [1-10] | [Why this score] |


### Superior Sample Necessities


**1. Question Chains** (Sequential Dependencies)
- Create sequences the place Question N+1 naturally follows Question N
- Instance: "What's X?" → "Why is X vital?" → "Tips on how to measure X?" → "Instruments for X"


**2. Faceted Exploration**
- Generate queries exploring totally different aspects concurrently
- Sides: Value, Time, High quality, Problem, Options


**3. Disambiguation Queries**
- When entities have a number of meanings, generate clarifying queries
- Instance: "Python" → "Python programming" vs "Python snake"


**4. Composite Queries**
- Mix a number of entities/intents in single queries
- Instance: "examine [Entity A] and [Entity B] for [Use Case]"


### Validation Necessities


Make sure the fan-out construction:
- [ ] Accommodates 40-60 complete queries throughout all themes
- [ ] Has clear hierarchical depth (4 ranges)
- [ ] Reveals express entity relationships
- [ ] Consists of each convergent and divergent expansions
- [ ] Demonstrates contextual variations
- [ ] Maintains semantic coherence inside themes
- [ ] Reveals pure question progressions
- [ ] Covers a number of person intents


## OUTPUT FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS


**CRITICAL: Generate fan-out queries as article headings construction for Website positioning content material creation:**


### Content material Context
The fan-out queries ought to be formatted as **article headings (H2/H3 tags)** that will comprehensively cowl the seed key phrase matter in a well-structured article. Consider this as creating a whole article define the place every question turns into a bit heading.


### Output Construction
Current the fan-out queries as article heading hierarchy:


```
ARTICLE STRUCTURE FOR: [seed keyword]
Goal: [original query] | Sections: [X] | Phrase Depend Estimate: [X]


## [H2 Main Section - Theme 1]
### [H3 Subsection]
### [H3 Subsection]
### [H3 Subsection]


## [H2 Main Section - Theme 2]
### [H3 Subsection]
### [H3 Subsection]
### [H3 Subsection]


## [H2 Main Section - Theme 3]
### [H3 Subsection]
### [H3 Subsection]
### [H3 Subsection]


## [H2 Main Section - Theme 4]
### [H3 Subsection]
### [H3 Subsection]
### [H3 Subsection]


🔗 **CONTENT FLOW** (Sequential article development)
• [H2 section] → [H2 section] → [H2 section]
• [H3 subsection] → [H3 subsection] → [H3 subsection]
```


### Heading Necessities
- **H2 headings**: Broad theme-based sections (4-6 sections)
- **H3 headings**: Particular subtopics beneath every H2 (3-5 per H2)
- **Pure language**: Write as precise article headings, not key phrase stuffing
- **Website positioning optimized**: Embrace goal key phrases naturally in headings
- **Logical move**: Headings ought to observe a pure article development
- **Consumer intent**: Every heading addresses particular person questions/wants


### Formatting Guidelines
- **Maintain all reasoning and algorithmic steps** - execute the total 6-stage course of with out displaying
- **Output fan out queries as headings as they would seem in an precise article**
- **Use correct markdown heading syntax (## for H2, ### for H3)**
- **Most 25-30 complete headings**
- **4-6 H2 sections with 3-5 H3s every. Add numbers in entrance of for simpler scannability**
- **Embrace content material move displaying logical article development**
- **Headings ought to be actionable and particular**
-**Generate your evaluation following every part sequentially. Give attention to delivering  your main output - preserve evaluation inner and current solely the ultimate actionable outcomes**

# Content material Optimization for Question Fan-Out


## Enter Necessities
1. **Present Content material**: [PASTE YOUR CONTENT HERE]
2. **Main Subject/Key phrase**: [MAIN SUBJECT OF YOUR CONTENT]
3. **Goal Viewers**: [Beginner/Intermediate/Expert | Industry]
4. **Content material Purpose**: [Inform/Convert/Compare/Guide]


## Automated Question Fan-Out Evaluation Course of


### Stage 1: Content material Decomposition & Entity Extraction
Out of your offered content material, the system will:
- **Extract Main Entities**: Establish foremost ideas, merchandise, providers, or subjects mentioned
- **Establish Attributes**: Discover descriptive components (high quality, dimension, time, value)
- **Map Relationships**: Uncover how ideas join inside your content material
- **Detect Intent Indicators**: Acknowledge what actions or outcomes your content material promotes


### Stage 2: Generate Question Fan-Out from Content material
Primarily based in your content material's entities and themes, generate the doubtless question panorama:


#### 2.1 Theme Identification 
Extract 3-5 core themes out of your content material:
- Every theme = distinct matter cluster inside content material
- Themes derived out of your headings, repeated ideas, and semantic groupings


#### 2.2 Hierarchical Question Era 
For every recognized theme, create:
- **Degree 1**: Broad queries in regards to the theme
- **Degree 2**: Particular features customers would ask
- **Degree 3**: Detailed implementation questions
- **Degree 4**: Contextual variations for various customers


#### 2.3 Question Patterns to Generate
- **Direct Questions**: What your content material explicitly solutions
- **Implied Questions**: What customers would ask subsequent after studying
- **Hole Questions**: Associated queries your content material ought to tackle
- **Bridge Questions**: Connections between your themes


### Stage 3: Protection Evaluation


#### 3.1 Question-Content material Matching 
For every generated question, assess:
- **Absolutely Addressed**: Question has devoted content material
- **Partially Addressed**: Question talked about however not detailed
- **Not Addressed**: Question lacking from content material


#### 3.2 Semantic Depth Scoring 
Consider how completely every theme is roofed:
- **Floor degree** (definitions solely): 1-3
- **Reasonable depth** (explanations): 4-6
- **Complete** (actionable particulars): 7-9
- **Professional degree** (nuanced insights): 10


### Stage 4: Hole Identification & Prioritization


#### 4.1 Essential Gaps (Should Tackle)
- Centroid queries of foremost themes not lined
- Primary "what's" questions unanswered
- Main entity relationships lacking
- Consumer intent misalignment


#### 4.2 Alternative Gaps (Ought to Tackle)
- Comparability queries not lined
- How-to/implementation particulars lacking
- Various options not mentioned
- Widespread issues/objections unaddressed


#### 4.3 Enhancement Gaps (May Tackle)
- Superior use circumstances
- Edge circumstances and exceptions
- Business-specific variations
- Future traits/predictions


## OUTPUT FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS


**CRITICAL: Generate optimized content material define as article headings construction that addresses all recognized question gaps:**


### Content material Context
The output ought to be formatted as an **improved article define (H2/H3 tags)** that comprehensively covers each present content material and recognized gaps. This creates an Website positioning-optimized content material construction that targets all related fan-out queries.


### Output Construction
Current the optimized content material define as article heading hierarchy:


```
OPTIMIZED CONTENT OUTLINE FOR: [primary topic]
Authentic Content material: [X] sections | Optimized: [X] sections | New Protection: [X] question gaps


## [H2 Current Section - Enhanced]
### [H3 Existing subsection - maintained]
### [H3 NEW: Missing query coverage]
### [H3 NEW: Gap query addressing [specific query]]


## [H2 NEW: Major theme missing from original]
### [H3 Foundational query: "What is..."]
### [H3 Implementation query: "How to..."]
### [H3 Comparison query: "X vs Y"]


## [H2 Current Section - Expanded]
### [H3 Existing subsection - maintained]
### [H3 NEW: Advanced use case]
### [H3 NEW: Troubleshooting common problems]


## [H2 NEW: User journey completion]
### [H3 Decision criteria]
### [H3 Implementation checklist]
### [H3 Success metrics]


 **CONTENT FLOW** (Logical article development)
• [H2 section] → [addresses gap] → [H2 section]
• [H3 subsection] → [bridges to] → [H3 subsection]
```


### Heading Necessities
- **H2 headings**: Enhanced present sections + new gap-filling sections
- **H3 headings**: Particular queries that weren't lined + maintained present content material
- **Hole indicators**: Mark new sections addressing recognized question gaps
- **Pure language**: Write as precise article headings for person readability
- **Website positioning optimized**: Embrace goal key phrases and associated question phrases naturally
- **Logical move**: Preserve content material development whereas filling gaps
- **Consumer intent**: Every heading addresses particular recognized lacking queries


### Formatting Guidelines
- **Maintain all reasoning and algorithmic steps** - execute the total 4-stage course of
- **Output fan out queries as headings as they would seem in an precise article**
- **4-6 H2 sections with 3-5 H3s every. Add numbers in entrance of for simpler scannability**
- **Mark new sections** that tackle recognized gaps
- **Preserve present sections** that already cowl queries effectively
- **Most 20-25 complete headings** for complete however manageable define
- **Embrace content material move displaying how sections join logically**
- **Give attention to question protection completeness** guaranteeing no main gaps stay

[Input Data] Key phrase export CSV: [PASTE YOUR CSV DATA WITH KEYWORDS AND SEARCH VOLUMES OR ATTACH AS A FILE] Present web site construction: [LIST YOUR MAIN PAGES/CATEGORIES]
[Goal Description] Given a key phrase export [CSV], group phrases into clusters mapped to pages. Spotlight clusters that symbolize strategic alternatives. Be aware: When export already contains search volumes from the device, no further validation step is required.
[Task Description] Analyze the key phrase listing and group semantically associated phrases into clusters. Map every cluster to present pages or determine wants for brand new pages. Calculate alternative scores based mostly on mixed search quantity, competitors indicators (if out there), and enterprise relevance. Prioritize clusters that symbolize untapped or high-value alternatives.
[Output Format] Ship:
   * Key phrase Clusters (grouped phrases with complete quantity)
   * Web page Mapping (cluster → present web page or "new web page wanted")
   * Alternative Rating (based mostly on quantity, competitors, relevance)
   * Strategic Suggestions (high 5 clusters to pursue)
   * Cannibalization Warnings (overlapping clusters)

[Input Data] SERP knowledge level 1: [PASTE SERP RANKINGS/SCREENSHOTS FROM DATE 1 OR ATTACH AS A FILE] SERP knowledge level 2: [PASTE SERP RANKINGS/SCREENSHOTS FROM DATE 2 OR ATTACH AS A FILE] Goal key phrase: [INSERT YOUR KEYWORD]
[Goal Description] Examine SERPs at two closing dates [data/screenshots] and summarize rating shifts, new entrants, and drop-offs.
[Task Description] Analyze the 2 SERP snapshots to determine all place adjustments. Spotlight vital actions (3+ positions), new domains showing within the high 10, domains that dropped out, and any SERP characteristic adjustments. Present strategic insights about what these actions counsel about algorithm updates or aggressive panorama shifts.
[Output Format] Construction as:
   * Main Movers (domains with 3+ place adjustments)
   * New Entrants (weren't within the high 10 earlier than)
   * Drop-offs (left the highest 10)
   * SERP Function Modifications
   * Strategic Implications
   * Beneficial Actions

Your activity is to behave as a SERP analyst, decoding search engine outcomes pages (SERPs) to supply a strategic, actionable content material plan. The aim is to create content material that not solely ranks but in addition genuinely satisfies person wants and outperforms opponents. Your output should be complete, structured, and straight actionable, leaving no room for ambiguity or hallucination.
Enter Information:
   * Goal Key phrase: [INSERT YOUR KEYWORD]
   * Present SERP Information (High 10 Outcomes): [PASTE THE TOP 10 RESULTS, INCLUDING TITLES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND URLs OR ATTACH AS A FILE]
   * Non-compulsory: Contextual Data: [E.G., YOUR BRAND/WEBSITE, TARGET AUDIENCE, EXISTING CONTENT, OR UNIQUE SELLING PROPOSITION]
Job Directions:
   1. Analyze the SERP: Look at the titles, meta descriptions, URLs, and the content material codecs (e.g., weblog posts, product pages, critiques, "how-to" guides, touchdown pages) of the highest 10 outcomes. This evaluation is essential for understanding how Google has interpreted the person's intent. Pay shut consideration to any particular content material consequence blocks (SCRBs) or SERP options which can be current.
   2. Establish Search Intent: Primarily based on the SERP evaluation, outline the first search intent. Classify it as one of many following, and supply a transparent justification:
   * Informational ("Know"): The person is seeking to study, discover a solution to a query, or discover a subject. That is the commonest search intent and may vary from easy information to advanced, in-depth subjects.
   * Navigational ("Go"): The person is looking for a selected web site or model (e.g., looking for "Fb login").
   * Transactional ("Do"): The person intends to make a purchase order or full a selected motion.
   * Industrial Investigation: The person is researching services or products earlier than making a purchase order (e.g., in search of "greatest trainers").
   3. Establish Secondary Intent Indicators: Search for different, much less dominant person intents or interpretations which can be additionally current within the SERP. For example, a primarily informational SERP may also include outcomes that counsel a industrial investigation intent. These secondary alerts are key to making a complete and extremely satisfying web page.
   4. Deconstruct Aggressive Content material: Analyze the widespread components, codecs, and patterns among the many top-ranking pages to know what presently satisfies customers. Search for:
   * Content material Kind & Format: What's the predominant content material sort (e.g., a information, a listicle, a product web page)? What format is used (e.g., long-form textual content, video, tables)?
   * Web page Parts: What particular sections or options seem repeatedly? This might embody a desk of contents, an FAQ part, comparability tables, calculators, or embedded movies.
   * E-E-A-T Indicators: Search for proof of Expertise, Experience, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness (E-E-A-T). For YMYL (Your Cash or Your Life) subjects, that is particularly crucial. Be aware how opponents set up their credentials (e.g., writer bios, citations, skilled critiques).
   5. Synthesize Suggestions: Primarily based on a holistic evaluation of the above, present a structured and actionable content material technique. The suggestions ought to be particular sufficient to information content material creation straight.
Output Format:
Your output should be structured with the next sections, utilizing clear and concise language.
   1. Main Search Intent Classification:
   * State the dominant intent (e.g., "Informational").
   * Present a quick justification based mostly on the top-ranking outcomes and the character of the question.
   2. Secondary Intent Indicators:
   * Checklist some other related intents which can be current within the SERP.
   * Present examples from the SERP knowledge that point out these secondary intents.
   3. Required Web page Parts (Should-Haves for Rating):
   * Create a bulleted listing of important on-page components. These are the content material sections, options, and subjects which can be crucial to incorporate to compete successfully.
   * For instance: "An in depth 'How-to' part with numbered steps," "A comparability desk of key product options," "An FAQ part addressing widespread person questions (drawn from 'Folks Additionally Ask' packing containers if current)."
   4. Content material Format Suggestions:
   * Specify the perfect content material format(s) for the brand new web page (e.g., "Lengthy-form weblog publish (2000+ phrases)," "Complete shopping for information," "Product touchdown web page with detailed specs").
   * Justify your suggestion by referencing the patterns and profitable codecs discovered within the aggressive SERP.
   5. SERP Function Alternatives:
   * Establish any SERP options (e.g., Featured Snippets, Folks Additionally Ask, Video Carousel, Native Pack, AI Overviews) that seem within the SERP knowledge.
   * For every recognized characteristic, counsel a selected content material optimization technique to extend the probability of successful that spot. For example, "To focus on the Featured Snippet, embody a concise, 50-word reply to the core question originally of the content material."
   6. Aggressive Differentiators Wanted:
   * Suggest distinctive components, content material angles, or E-E-A-T alerts that may make the brand new web page stand out and supply a superior person expertise in comparison with the highest opponents. This part is about going past merely matching the SERP and offering true added worth.
   * Examples might embody: "Incorporate authentic analysis or a proprietary examine," "Embrace an interactive device or calculator," or "Function a testimonial or quote from a acknowledged business skilled."

Your Job:
Generate a number of title variations for a given matter that focus on totally different person intents and psychological triggers, whereas conserving Website positioning greatest practices in thoughts.
Enter Necessities:
   * Subject/key phrase: [insert topic/keyword]

   * Audience: [insert audience]

Pointers:
      1. Create titles which can be clear, pure, and beneath 60 characters.

      2. Use the key phrase naturally (keep away from stuffing).

      3. Present variations throughout these frameworks:

         * Profit-driven (outcome-focused)

         * Curiosity hole (tease/incomplete information)

         * Authority/credibility sign

         * Urgency/timeliness

         * Downside-agitation

         * Contrarian/myth-busting

         * Social proof

         * How-to/instructional

         * Checklist/useful resource format

         * Comparability/versus

Output Format:
 Current leads to a desk with:
            * Framework | Title | Character Depend | Emotional Set off | Greatest Use Case

# ROLE
You're a senior Website positioning analyst with web-browsing capabilities.


# INPUT (minimal)
- page_content: """PASTE THE FULL CURRENT ARTICLE BODY HERE OR ATTACH AS A FILE"""
- page_url (non-obligatory): https://instance.com/path


# OBJECTIVE
1) Establish each outdated, incorrect, or low-trust ingredient within the content material through recent exterior sources.
2) Determine: UPDATE the web page beneath the identical URL vs. create a NEW PAGE (or MERGE), based mostly on intent shift, freshness gaps, and cannibalization danger.
3) Present a succinct, actionable plan.


# RESEARCH RULES (no guessing)
- Browse the dwell net. Prioritize main sources, official docs, and knowledge throughout the final 12–24 months (until evergreen).
- For every reality/date/value/legislation/characteristic/stat referenced or implied by the content material, confirm in opposition to not less than 1–2 present sources. Seize supply title, writer, and publication/replace date.
- Verify the present SERP: high rating pages, their focus/intent, and visual SERP options (e.g., PAA, video, procuring, information, native pack).
- Verify person curiosity development for the primary matter during the last 24 months (e.g., Google Traits or equal) and observe seasonality vs. structural decline.
- If page_url is given, run a fast web site overlap examine (web site:area question) to identify inner cannibalization candidates.


# ANALYSIS STEPS
1) Extract & Label Information
   - From page_content, listing each time-sensitive declare (numbers, years, steps, insurance policies, product options, screenshots, device UIs, model names, costs).
   - Mark every as {present / outdated / unverifiable}. For “outdated/unverifiable,” suggest corrected textual content + 1–2 citations.


2) Intent & SERP Match
   - Infer the article’s dominant intent from headings and opening sections.
   - Examine to at present’s high SERP outcomes: intent (information/examine/transactional/native), construction (how-to, guidelines, device, glossary), depth, freshness, and distinctive property (calculator, template, video).
   - Be aware any significant SERP shifts because the content material’s doubtless publish/replace timeframe.


3) Consumer Curiosity & Language Shift
   - Summarize 24-month question development (rising/flat/declining; seasonal?).
   - Flag terminology adjustments (e.g., product rebrands, API deprecations, new coverage names) that will make the content material really feel dated.


4) Cannibalization Danger (0–10)
   - If page_url is offered, listing on-site pages with ≥60% topical overlap or near-duplicate titles.
   - Rating danger utilizing: question/matter overlap depth (40%), intent similarity (30%), on-site title/slug redundancy (20%), URL proximity (10%).
   - Present subscores + weighted math and identify any URL to consolidate.


5) Feasibility Determination
   - Select precisely one: UPDATE vs NEW PAGE vs MERGE vs NO ACTION.
   - Use this determination logic:
     • UPDATE if intent remains to be the identical and ≥60% of content material stays structurally helpful; freshness points are fixable with revisions.
     • NEW PAGE if the dominant intent/format on at present’s SERP is distinct (e.g., device/comparability/native pack) or increasing would dilute the present web page’s focus.
     • MERGE if one other inner URL already higher satisfies the identical intent; specify the canonical goal and redirect plan.
     • NO ACTION if demand is structurally declining and the chance is low.


6) Implementation Plan (just for the chosen path)
   - Define: new H1, H2/H3 construction, entities to cowl, examples/screenshots to refresh, required visuals/instruments (calculator/template), inner hyperlinks (supply → anchor → goal), meta title/description draft, and schema recommendations.
   - Measurement plan: main queries, KPIs (impressions, CTR, clicks, avg pos), checkpoints at 28/56/84 days.


# OUTPUT (markdown, concise)
- **Determination:** [Update | New Page | Merge | No Action] — one-sentence rationale.
- **What’s Outdated (Earlier than → After):** bullet listing with replacements + citations.
- **Intent & SERP Abstract:** at present’s dominant intent/format, key gaps vs. opponents, notable SERP options.
- **Cannibalization Danger (0–10):** rating with subscores & URLs (if page_url given).
- **Implementation Plan:** tight bullets tailor-made to the choice.
- **Danger & Mitigation:** high 3 dangers with concrete mitigations.
- **Sources:** listing all citations with titles, publishers, and dates.


# CONSTRAINTS
- Don't hallucinate. If a declare can’t be verified, mark “unverifiable” and counsel elimination or impartial phrasing.
- Favor conserving the identical URL if intent hasn’t modified and fairness is powerful; solely advocate NEW PAGE when intent/format clearly diverges.
- Maintain complete output ~400–700 phrases until many information require correction.

[YOUR TASK] You're an skilled Website positioning analyst and content material strategist specializing in Google's High quality Rater Pointers and the E-E-A-T framework. Your activity is to carry out a deep evaluation of a offered piece of content material, evaluating its alerts for Expertise, Experience, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

[CONTEXT] The aim is to research the offered content material in opposition to Google's high quality requirements, particularly specializing in E-E-A-T. You'll determine areas the place the content material could be improved to higher reveal credibility and experience, that are essential for rating, particularly for Your Cash or Your Life (YMYL) subjects. Your suggestions ought to be sensible and goal to strengthen person belief and search engine recognition.

[INPUT DATA]
            * Content material to Analyze: [PASTE YOUR CONTENT HERE]
            * Writer Data: [PROVIDE AUTHOR CREDENTIALS, e.g., Name, Title, Bio, relevant experience, publications, etc.]
            * Web site Context: [DESCRIBE THE SITE'S AUTHORITY AND REPUTATION, e.g., Niche, age, traffic, type of content, etc.]

[DETAILED TASK INSTRUCTIONS]
            1. Analyze Expertise Indicators: Consider if the content material demonstrates first-hand expertise with the subject. Search for private anecdotes, distinctive insights, or sensible examples that present the writer has lived expertise.
            2. Assess Experience: Decide the extent of data and talent displayed. Search for the usage of particular terminology, detailed explanations, and a transparent understanding of the subject material that goes past a fundamental overview. The depth and accuracy of the content material, in addition to writer credentials and {qualifications}, are key to demonstrating experience.
            3. Consider Authoritativeness: Decide the fame of each the writer and the web site as a go-to supply for the subject. Verify for writer credentials, exterior citations from respected sources, and inner linking to different authoritative content material on the location.
            4. Establish Trustworthiness Indicators: Discover all components that construct person confidence. Search for clear citations, verifiable proof, transparency (e.g., disclosure insurance policies), safety features (e.g., HTTPS), {and professional} presentation. Belief is a very powerful element of E-E-A-T, as untrustworthy pages have low E-E-A-T no matter different components.

[AI INSTRUCTION & SELF-CORRECTION]
            * If the offered info in [INPUT DATA] is inadequate or ambiguous, clearly state what info is lacking and the way it impacts your capability to supply a complete evaluation.
            * Keep away from producing generic or placeholder textual content. If a selected element of the output format can't be accomplished with significant knowledge, state the explanation clearly within the corresponding part.
            * Prioritize actionable, particular suggestions over common recommendation. For instance, as an alternative of claiming "enhance content material," counsel "add a devoted writer bio with skilled credentials and hyperlinks to verifiable work."

[CONSTRAINTS & CONSIDERATIONS]
            * Reference the Google Search High quality Rater Pointers in your evaluation, particularly for the way it defines and evaluates E-E-A-T.
            * If the content material falls beneath a YMYL matter (e.g., medical, monetary, authorized), apply the stricter E-E-A-T requirements required for these classes.
            * Your evaluation ought to be goal and based mostly on established Website positioning ideas, not private opinion.

[OUTPUT FORMAT] Present your evaluation within the following structured format.
E-E-A-T Scorecard & Evaluation
E-E-A-T Aspect
	Evaluation & Findings
	Belief Sign Power
	Expertise
	[Describe what signals of experience are present or missing. Use specific examples from the text.]
	[Present/Missing/Weak]
	Experience
	[Evaluate the level of expertise shown by the author and content.]
	[Strong/Moderate/Weak]
	Authoritativeness
	[Assess the authority of the author and the website. Are they a recognized authority in this field?]
	[Strong/Moderate/Weak]
	Trustworthiness
	[Identify all present trust elements (e.g., citations, transparency) and note what's missing.]
	[Strong/Moderate/Weak]
	Export to Sheets

Precedence Enchancment Suggestions
Present a ranked listing of essentially the most crucial enhancements wanted, from highest to lowest precedence.
            1. [High Priority Improvement]: [Describe the specific change needed, e.g., "Add author bio with credentials."]
            2. [Medium Priority Improvement]: [Describe the specific change needed.]
            3. [Lower Priority Improvement]: [Describe the specific change needed.]

Implementation Examples
For the highest 3 precedence suggestions, present concrete, actionable examples of how you can implement them.
            * For [Recommendation #1]: [Provide a specific example of how to implement this, e.g., "Create an 'About the Author' section with a headshot, their professional title, and links to their LinkedIn profile or other published works."]
            * For [Recommendation #2]: [Provide a specific example.]
            * For [Recommendation #3]: [Provide a specific example.]

[Input Data] Business/area of interest: [INSERT YOUR INDUSTRY] Audience: [DESCRIBE YOUR AUDIENCE] Enterprise objectives: [LIST KEY OBJECTIVES] Recognized seasonal traits: [LIST ANY KNOWN PATTERNS]
[Goal Description] Generate themes for [industry/niche] contemplating seasonal traits and business occasions.
[Task Description] Create a strategic 12-month content material calendar with month-to-month themes that align with seasonal search traits, business occasions, shopping for cycles, and enterprise targets. Embrace content material sorts, goal key phrases themes, and promotional angles for every month.
[Output Format] Month-to-month breakdown together with:
            * Month | Theme | Content material Pillars (3) | Key Matters (5) | Seasonal Tie-ins | Business Occasions | Content material Varieties

[Input Data] A number of web page contents: [PASTE CONTENT FROM ALL PAGES TO EVALUATE OR ATTACH AS A FILE]  Present URLs: [LIST ALL URLS] Present rankings: [PROVIDE RANKING DATA FOR EACH OR ATTACH AS A FILE]
[Goal Description] Establish Redundancies [Paste multiple page contents]. Recommend a consolidation technique.
[Task Description] Analyze all offered content material for topical overlap, key phrase cannibalization, and redundant info. Establish which pages ought to be consolidated, which ought to stay separate, and how you can merge content material whereas preserving Website positioning worth. Contemplate redirect methods and content material migration paths.
[Output Format] Ship:
            * Redundancy Matrix (overlap percentages)
            * Consolidation Suggestions (merge/preserve/delete)
            * Main Web page Choice (which turns into the canonical)
            * Content material Migration Map
            * Redirect Plan
            * Anticipated Website positioning Affect

[Input Data] Draft content material: [PASTE YOUR DRAFT] Goal key phrases: [LIST YOUR KEYWORDS] Model pointers: [PASTE KEY GUIDELINES] Supply supplies: [LIST/LINK SOURCES]
[Goal Description] [Deep research mode only] Consider drafts for originality, hallucination, citations, and elegance.
[Task Description] Carry out complete editorial QA checking for factual accuracy, originality, potential AI hallucinations, correct quotation utilization, type consistency, and model voice alignment. Flag any unsubstantiated claims, lacking citations, or deviations from pointers. Confirm all statistics and claims in opposition to offered sources.
[Output Format] QA Report together with:
            * Originality Rating (with flagged passages)
            * Potential Hallucinations/Inaccuracies
            * Quotation Audit (lacking/wanted)
            * Type Consistency Points
            * Model Voice Alignment
            * Reality-Verify Outcomes
            * Precedence Revisions

[Your Task]
You're an skilled content material strategist with deep experience in aggressive evaluation, market positioning, and content material differentiation. Your function is to conduct an intensive strategic evaluation that goes past surface-level evaluation to uncover actionable aggressive intelligence.
Enter Parameters
Main Information Sources
Competitor URLs/Content material: [PASTE COMPETITOR CONTENT OR URLS] Your Present Content material: [PASTE YOUR CONTENT] Goal Market Profile: [DESCRIBE YOUR MARKET - Include demographics, psychographics, pain points, content consumption habits]
Market Context
Business Sector: [Specify industry/niche] Aggressive Panorama: [Brief description of key players] Enterprise Aims: [Primary goals: brand awareness, lead generation, thought leadership, etc.] Content material Distribution Channels: [Where content will be published/promoted] Goal Viewers Segments: [Primary and secondary audience personas]
Strategic Evaluation Framework
1. Content material Technique Structure Evaluation
Look at every competitor's content material by way of these strategic lenses:
Content material Mission & Imaginative and prescient:
            * What overarching story are they telling?
            * How does their content material align with their model positioning?
            * What transformation do they promise their viewers?
Strategic Pillars:
            * Core content material themes and matter clusters
            * Experience areas they're establishing authority in
            * How content material helps their gross sales funnel levels
Content material Ecosystem Mapping:
            * Content material sorts and codecs utilized
            * Publishing frequency and consistency patterns
            * Cross-channel content material repurposing methods
2. Viewers Intelligence & Focusing on
Viewers Segmentation:
            * Main and secondary audiences being focused
            * Viewers journey levels addressed
            * Ache factors and aspirations being addressed
Engagement Psychology:
            * Emotional triggers and persuasion strategies used
            * Group constructing and viewers retention methods
            * Consumer-generated content material integration approaches
3. Content material Efficiency Indicators
Engagement Metrics Evaluation:
            * Social shares, feedback, and engagement patterns
            * Content material format efficiency variations
            * Viral content material traits and triggers
Website positioning & Discoverability Technique:
            * Key phrase focusing on approaches and search intent alignment
            * Content material hole evaluation in search outcomes
            * Featured snippet and SERP characteristic optimization
4. Content material High quality & Depth Evaluation
Data Structure:
            * Content material depth vs. breadth methods
            * Technical accuracy and credibility alerts
            * Analysis high quality and supply attribution
Narrative & Storytelling:
            * Model voice and tone consistency
            * Storytelling strategies and narrative constructions
            * Case research and social proof integration
Consumer Expertise Design:
            * Content material formatting and readability optimization
            * Visible content material integration and design high quality
            * Interactive components and engagement options
Strategic Differentiation Evaluation
5. Aggressive Positioning Evaluation
Market Place Mapping:
            * The place every competitor positions themselves available in the market
            * Pricing technique reflection in content material strategy
            * Goal market overlap and differentiation
Model Character Evaluation:
            * Voice, tone, and communication type patterns
            * Model values mirrored by way of content material decisions
            * Cultural and social positioning methods
6. Innovation & Development Management
Content material Innovation Evaluation:
            * Early adoption of recent content material codecs or platforms
            * Experimental content material approaches and risk-taking
            * Expertise integration and digital transformation
Thought Management Analysis:
            * Business development prediction and commentary
            * Authentic analysis and knowledge contribution
            * Talking at occasions and business participation
Hole Evaluation & Alternative Identification
7. Strategic Hole Mapping
Content material Protection Gaps:
            * Underserved viewers segments or use circumstances
            * Lacking content material within the buyer journey
            * Unexplored matter areas with search demand
Format and Channel Gaps:
            * Underutilized content material codecs or distribution channels
            * Rising platform alternatives
            * Cross-platform content material optimization alternatives
Aggressive Vulnerability Evaluation:
            * Areas the place opponents present content material weaknesses
            * Outdated or inaccurate info alternatives
            * Buyer grievance themes not addressed in content material
Output Deliverables
Complete Strategic Report
Govt Abstract
            * Key aggressive insights and strategic implications
            * High 3 differentiation alternatives with highest ROI potential
            * Essential motion gadgets for instant implementation
Detailed Evaluation Sections:
1. Competitor Technique Matrix | Competitor | Core Technique | Content material Pillars | Distinctive Angle | Viewers Focus | Efficiency Indicators |
2. Content material Depth & High quality Comparability
            * Complete scoring throughout content material high quality dimensions
            * Benchmark evaluation of content material depth and experience demonstration
            * Consumer expertise and engagement optimization evaluation
3. Distinctive Worth Proposition Evaluation For every competitor:
            * Core worth proposition articulation
            * Supporting proof and proof factors
            * Differentiation from different market gamers
            * Viewers resonance evaluation
4. Strategic Hole & Alternative Matrix | Alternative Space | Market Demand | Aggressive Depth | Implementation Complexity | ROI Potential |
5. Differentiation Technique Suggestions
Positioning Methods:
            * 3-5 particular positioning angles with rationale
            * Audience refinement suggestions
            * Model voice and messaging differentiation approaches
Content material Technique Pivots:
            * Subject space enlargement or area of interest focusing suggestions
            * Content material format innovation alternatives
            * Distribution channel optimization methods
Aggressive Benefit Activation:
            * Distinctive strengths to leverage in content material strategy
            * Proprietary knowledge, insights, or experience to spotlight
            * Partnership or collaboration alternatives
6. Implementation Roadmap Section 1 (0-3 months): Fast Wins
            * Excessive-impact, low-effort differentiation techniques
            * Content material optimization alternatives
            * Rapid gap-filling content material creation
Section 2 (3-6 months): Strategic Builds
            * Main content material pillar improvement
            * New format or channel experimentation
            * Thought management marketing campaign improvement
Section 3 (6-12 months): Market Management
            * Business-leading content material initiatives
            * Authentic analysis and knowledge creation
            * Group constructing and ecosystem improvement
Strategic Success Metrics
Content material Efficiency KPIs:
            * Engagement charge enhancements
            * Search rating enhancements for goal key phrases
            * Lead technology and conversion metrics
Aggressive Positioning Metrics:
            * Share of voice in goal subjects
            * Model point out sentiment evaluation
            * Market place motion indicators
Enterprise Affect Indicators:
            * Pipeline affect and attribution
            * Buyer acquisition value enhancements
            * Model consciousness and recall metrics
Evaluation Pointers
Depth Necessities:
            * Analyze minimal 5-10 items of content material per competitor
            * Look at content material throughout a number of codecs and channels
            * Evaluate 3-6 month content material publishing patterns
Objectivity Requirements:
            * Present evidence-based assessments
            * Acknowledge competitor strengths truthfully
            * Give attention to strategic alternatives quite than criticism
Actionability Focus:
            * Each perception ought to connect with particular motion gadgets
            * Prioritize suggestions by impression and feasibility
            * Embrace useful resource necessities and timeline estimates
Execute this evaluation with the mindset of a senior content material strategist who understands that nice content material technique isn't just about creating higher content material, however about creating content material that serves a bigger enterprise technique and builds sustainable aggressive benefits.

[Input Data] Goal key phrase: [INSERT YOUR KEYWORD] Your content material: [PASTE YOUR CONTENT OR ATTACH AS A FILE]
[Goal Description] Scrape Google first web page for key phrase [X], learn all articles rating on the primary web page, and consider how their content material is healthier than my [paste content] and counsel enhancements.
[Task Description] Analyze all first-page outcomes for the goal key phrase. Examine their content material construction, depth, distinctive insights, media utilization, and person expertise components in opposition to your content material. Establish particular components that make competing content material superior and supply actionable enhancements.
[Output Format] Comparative evaluation:
            * High Rating Components (widespread components in high outcomes)
            * Content material Gaps (what opponents cowl that you do not)
            * Depth Evaluation (phrase depend, element degree)
            * Distinctive Parts (options you lack)
            * Enchancment Precedence Checklist
            * Implementation Roadmap

Context & Function
You're an skilled Website positioning strategist specializing in semantic inner linking that aligns with Google's fashionable content material understanding. Your experience focuses on creating contextually related anchor textual content that serves each customers and search engines like google by following Google's descriptive anchor textual content pointers quite than keyword-stuffing approaches.
Enter Information Necessities
Web site URL Stock:
            * CSV knowledge with web site URLs and their corresponding headlines/titles: {CSV_DATA OR ATTACH AS A FILE}
            * Present article URL being optimized: {CURRENT_ARTICLE_URL}
            * Present article content material/textual content: {ARTICLE_CONTENT OR ATTACH AS A FILE}
Job Goal
Analyze the offered article content material and counsel semantically acceptable inner hyperlinks with pure anchor textual content that will genuinely profit readers. Give attention to sentence-level contextual relevance quite than key phrase focusing on.
Evaluation Methodology
Step 1: Content material Context Evaluation
            * Establish the primary subjects and subtopics mentioned within the article
            * Map the semantic themes and pure dialogue move
            * Find sentences that might profit from supporting info
            * Discover contexts the place readers would naturally search extra particulars
Step 2: Semantic Matching Course of
For every potential hyperlink alternative:
            * Context analysis: Does the goal web page content material genuinely increase on the present sentence/paragraph matter?
            * Reader worth take a look at: Would an actual reader click on this hyperlink for related extra info?
            * Anchor textual content naturalness: Does the proposed anchor textual content make sense when learn in isolation?
            * Semantic alignment: Do the supply and goal content material themes genuinely relate?
Step 3: Anchor Textual content Optimization
Create anchor textual content that:
            * Passes Google's "out of context" readability take a look at
            * Makes use of pure, descriptive language
            * Offers clear context for what the reader will discover
            * Avoids key phrase stuffing or synthetic optimization patterns
Essential Pointers
DO:
            * Create anchor textual content that clearly describes the goal web page content material
            * Hyperlink solely when it supplies real worth to readers
            * Use pure language that flows with the sentence
            * Contemplate the precise sentence context, not simply total subjects
            * Guarantee anchor textual content is smart when learn alone
DON'T:
            * Power hyperlinks simply because key phrases match
            * Use keyword-rich anchor textual content with out contextual relevance
            * Hyperlink to pages with totally different semantic contexts than the supply sentence
            * Create anchor textual content that disrupts studying move
            * Recommend hyperlinks readers would by no means realistically click on
Validation Verify:
Earlier than suggesting every hyperlink, confirm:
            1.  An actual reader would discover worth in clicking this hyperlink
            2.  The anchor textual content describes what they will discover on the goal web page
            3.  The semantic themes genuinely align between supply and goal
            4.  The anchor textual content reads naturally throughout the sentence context
Output Format
Semantic Inner Hyperlink Suggestions
Article Evaluation:
            * Present Article: https://footework.com/or-and-andor-what-does-that-mean-on-my-title/
            * Primary Matters Recognized: [List 3-5 primary topics discussed]
            * Hyperlink Alternatives Discovered: [Number of viable linking opportunities]
Beneficial Inner Hyperlinks:
Hyperlink 1:
            * Goal URL: https://docs.python.org/3/library/csv.html
            * Goal Web page Title: [Headline from CSV]
            * Supply Sentence: "[Exact sentence where link should be placed]"
            * Beneficial Anchor Textual content: "[Natural, descriptive anchor text]"
            * Contextual Rationale: [Brief explanation of why this link adds value in this context]
            * Reader Profit: [What additional value this provides to readers]
Hyperlink 2:
            * Goal URL: https://docs.python.org/3/library/csv.html
            * Goal Web page Title: [Headline from CSV]
            * Supply Sentence: "[Exact sentence where link should be placed]"
            * Beneficial Anchor Textual content: "[Natural, descriptive anchor text]"
            * Contextual Rationale: [Brief explanation of why this link adds value in this context]
            * Reader Profit: [What additional value this provides to readers]
[Continue for all recommended links]
Implementation Notes:
            * Excessive Precedence Hyperlinks: [Links that provide maximum reader value]
            * Context Concerns: [Any special placement or timing recommendations]
            * Various Anchor Textual content: [Secondary anchor text options if primary doesn't fit naturally]
High quality Validation Guidelines
For every beneficial hyperlink:
            * Anchor textual content is smart when learn out of context
            * Goal web page content material genuinely pertains to supply sentence matter
            * An actual reader would doubtless click on for extra related info
            * Anchor textual content makes use of pure, descriptive language
            * Hyperlink enhances quite than disrupts content material move
            * Semantic themes align between supply and goal content material
________________

Generate inner hyperlink recommendations that complement Google's semantic understanding whereas offering real person worth by way of contextually related connections.

[Input Data] Present meta title: [PASTE CURRENT TITLE] Present meta description: [PASTE CURRENT DESCRIPTION] Goal key phrase: [INSERT KEYWORD] SERP competitors: [PASTE COMPETING TITLES/DESCRIPTIONS]
[Goal Description] Rewrite metadata aligned to dwell SERPs.
[Task Description] Create optimized meta titles and descriptions that stand out in SERPs whereas incorporating goal key phrases naturally. Contemplate SERP actual property, click-through charge optimization, and differentiation from opponents. Guarantee compliance with character limits and greatest practices.
[Output Format] Present:
            * 3 Title Tag Choices (with character counts)
            * 3 Meta Description Choices (with character counts)
            * CTR Optimization Rationale
            * Differentiation Technique
            * A/B Testing Suggestions

[Input Data] Content material to reinforce: [PASTE YOUR CONTENT OR ATTACH AS A FILE] Goal key phrases: [LIST YOUR KEYWORDS] Competitor examples: [OPTIONAL - PASTE COMPETITOR CONTENT OR ATTACH AS A FILE]
[Goal Description] Analyze [paste content] and counsel the place to: Add inner hyperlinks with anchor textual content, Add visible content material (photos, charts, movies), Enhance scannability and takeaways.
[Task Description] Evaluate the content material for enhancement alternatives throughout three dimensions: inner linking alternatives with particular anchor textual content suggestions, visible content material gaps the place photos/charts/movies would enhance understanding, and scannability enhancements for higher person expertise and engagement.
[Output Format] Enhancement plan with:
            * Inner Hyperlink Alternatives (location | goal web page | anchor textual content)
            * Visible Content material Suggestions (location | sort | objective)
            * Scannability Enhancements (present concern | steered repair)
            * Key Takeaway Sections (the place so as to add summaries/highlights)
            * Implementation Precedence Order

[Input Data] Service web page content material: [PASTE YOUR SERVICE PAGE CONTENT] Goal cities: [LIST YOUR TARGET CITIES] Native market insights: [PROVIDE ANY KNOWN LOCAL DIFFERENCES]
[Goal Description] Create location-specific content material variations for this service web page: [paste content] for these cities: [list cities]
[Task Description] Generate distinctive, locally-relevant variations of your service web page for every goal metropolis. Embrace native landmarks, neighborhood names, native rules, market circumstances, and community-specific ache factors. Guarantee every variation is considerably distinctive whereas sustaining model consistency.
[Output Format] For every metropolis, present:
            * Localized Title Tag
            * Distinctive Opening Paragraph
            * Native Market Context Part
            * Metropolis-Particular Ache Factors
            * Native Proof/Testimonials Placement
            * Neighborhood/Space Mentions
            * Native Schema Markup Suggestions

[Input Data] Enterprise description: [DESCRIBE YOUR BUSINESS] Metropolis/area: [INSERT YOUR CITY/REGION] Widespread buyer issues: [LIST KNOWN CONCERNS OR ATTACH AS A FILE] Native competitors: [LIST KEY COMPETITORS]
[Goal Description] Analysis and create domestically related FAQ sections for [business description] in [city/region], addressing native buyer issues. This ought to be completed through deep analysis.
[Task Description] Develop complete FAQ content material that addresses location-specific issues, native rules, area-specific service particulars, and regional variations in your providing. Embrace questions on native availability, area-specific pricing, native competitors differentiators, and community-specific points.
[Output Format] FAQ sections organized by:
            * Normal Native Questions (5-7)
            * Space-Particular Service Questions (5-7)
            * Native Pricing/Availability (3-5)
            * Regional Laws/Compliance (3-5)
            * Native Competitors Differentiators (3-5)
            * Schema Markup for FAQ

**[Input Data]**
1. Backlink hole knowledge: [PASTE CSV WITH DOMAINS OR URLs FROM SEO TOOL OR ATTACH AS A FILE]  
2. Our web site URLs for hyperlink placement: [PASTE LIST OF YOUR WEBSITE URLS/PAGES TO PROMOTE OR ATTACH AS A FILE]  
3. Your web site area of interest/matter: [DESCRIBE YOUR WEBSITE FOCUS AND VALUE PROPOSITION]


**[Research Methodology]**
For every area/URL within the hole evaluation, execute the next analysis protocol:


**Section 1: Area Evaluation & Web page Discovery**
- If enter is URL: Extract area and analyze the linking context
- If enter is area: Discover all the web site construction
- Search the area for related pages the place our hyperlinks would add worth:
  * Web site search: "web site:area.com [your niche keywords]"
  * Verify class pages, useful resource pages, guides, listicles
  * Discover weblog posts discussing subjects associated to your content material
  * Establish outdated content material that wants up to date sources
  * Search for damaged hyperlink alternatives
- For every related web page discovered, decide which of your offered URLs can be the very best match
- Doc the SPECIFIC PAGE URL from their web site that ought to hyperlink to your SPECIFIC URL


**Section 2: Contact Discovery Protocol**
Execute these search queries in sequence:
1. "web site:area.com contact OR about OR staff OR editorial OR workers"
2. "web site:area.com writer OR editor OR contributor"
3. "[domain name] content material supervisor OR editor OR head of content material web site:linkedin.com"
4. Verify /about, /staff, /contact, /write-for-us, /contribute pages
5. Establish writer bylines on related content material sections
6. Seek for e mail patterns: firstname@, first.final@, editor@
7. Cross-reference LinkedIn profiles with area affiliation
8. If particular web page writer is recognized, prioritize them as contact


**Section 3: Outreach Personalization**
For every alternative, create e mail containing:
- Topic line referencing their particular content material
- Opening: "I used to be studying your article [EXACT TITLE] at [THEIR PAGE URL]"
- Context: Particular part/paragraph the place your useful resource provides worth
- Worth proposition: "I observed you point out [topic] - we've got a complete information at [YOUR SPECIFIC URL] that expands on this"
- Profit: How this enhances their reader's expertise
- Name to motion: Tender ask to evaluate your useful resource for inclusion
- Size: 150-200 phrases most


**[Output Format]**
Area | Their Web page URL (the place hyperlink ought to be added) | Our URL (to be linked) | Hyperlink Context/Purpose | Outreach E mail Content material | Contact Individual | Contact E mail


**[Matching Logic]**
When pairing their pages together with your URLs:
- Precise matter match (highest precedence)
- Complementary content material (their overview → your detailed information)
- Useful resource gaps (they point out matter briefly → you may have full useful resource)
- Replace alternatives (their previous statistics → your present knowledge)
- Consumer journey match (their downside description → your resolution)


**[Example Output Row]**
instance.com | instance.com/weblog/seo-basics | oursite.com/advanced-seo-guide | Their article mentions superior strategies with out element - our information supplies the depth | "Hello [Name], I used to be studying your article 'Website positioning Fundamentals' and observed you point out superior hyperlink constructing in part 3. We have created a complete information at oursite.com/advanced-seo-guide that covers these strategies intimately. Your readers in search of to degree up out of your fundamentals article would discover this worthwhile. Would you think about including it as a useful resource?" | John Smith | john@instance.com


**[Quality Parameters]**
- Should specify EXACT URLs for each their web page and your web page
- Should clarify WHERE on their web page the hyperlink would match (which part/context)
- E mail should reference particular content material components from their web page
- Prioritize pages with present outbound hyperlinks in related context
- Skip irrelevant pages even when area is related


**[Fallback Protocol]**
If particular contact can't be discovered:
- Go away contact columns empty
- Nonetheless present the web page matching and outreach template
- Be aware if solely contact type is obtainable

[Input Data] Your Website positioning metrics: [PASTE YOUR KEY SEO METRICS OR ATTACH AS A FILE] Competitor identify: [INSERT COMPETITOR NAME] Competitor Website positioning metrics: [PASTE COMPETITOR METRICS OR ATTACH AS A FILE] Market context: [DESCRIBE YOUR MARKET]
[Goal Description] Create a SWOT evaluation evaluating our Website positioning technique vs [competitor name]
[Task Description] Develop a complete SWOT evaluation evaluating Website positioning methods. Consider technical Website positioning, content material high quality, backlink profiles, key phrase rankings, and total natural visibility. Embrace quantitative metrics the place out there and qualitative assessments of technique effectiveness.
[Output Format] SWOT Matrix with:
            * Strengths (your Website positioning benefits)
            * Weaknesses (the place competitor excels)
            * Alternatives (untapped potential)
            * Threats (competitor strikes to observe)
            * Strategic Suggestions (5 key actions)
            * Precedence Implementation Plan

[Input Data] Competitor content material stock: [PASTE URLS OR CONTENT LIST OR ATTACH AS A FILE]  
Your content material stock: [PASTE YOUR URLS OR CONTENT LIST OR ATTACH AS A FILE]  
Audience: [DESCRIBE YOUR AUDIENCE]
[Goal Description] Floor angles/subjects opponents cowl that you do not.
[Task Description] Establish content material subjects, angles, and codecs that opponents are efficiently utilizing however are lacking out of your content material technique. Analyze not simply subjects but in addition content material depth, codecs, and person intent protection. Prioritize gaps based mostly on search quantity and enterprise relevance.
[Output Format] Hole evaluation together with:
            * Lacking Matters (competitor has, you do not)
            * Angle Variations (identical matter, totally different strategy)
            * Format Gaps (content material sorts you are lacking)
            * Depth Evaluation (the place opponents go deeper)
            * Precedence Hole Checklist (ranked by alternative)
            * Content material Creation Roadmap

[Input Data] Screenshot: [PASTE SCREENSHOT DESCRIPTION] Conversion aim: [DESCRIBE DESIRED ACTION] Present conversion charge: [PROVIDE IF KNOWN] Audience: [DESCRIBE YOUR AUDIENCE]
[Goal Description] Recommend conversion enhancements for touchdown pages/screenshots.
[Task Description] Audit the touchdown web page for conversion optimization alternatives. Consider headline effectiveness, worth proposition readability, CTA placement and duplicate, belief alerts, web page load velocity indicators, cell responsiveness, and friction factors within the conversion path.
[Output Format] Audit report with:
            * Above-the-Fold Evaluation
            * Worth Proposition Rating (1-10)
            * CTA Effectiveness Evaluate
            * Belief Sign Stock
            * Friction Level Identification
            * A/B Take a look at Suggestions
            * Precedence Repair Checklist

[Input Data] Present CTAs: [PASTE YOUR CTA TEXT AND PLACEMENT] Kind fields: [LIST ALL FORM FIELDS] Conversion funnel: [DESCRIBE YOUR FUNNEL STEPS] Drop-off knowledge: [PROVIDE IF AVAILABLE]
[Goal Description] Evaluate CTAs and types for readability, persuasiveness, and drop-off danger. Advocate fixes.
[Task Description] Analyze all CTAs and type components for psychological friction, unclear messaging, and pointless complexity. Consider type area necessity, CTA button copy, micro-copy effectiveness, and total person move. Establish particular friction factors inflicting drop-offs.
[Output Format] Optimization plan:
            * CTA Copy Variations (3 per CTA)
            * Kind Area Audit (preserve/take away/modify)
            * Micro-copy Enhancements
            * Friction Rating by Aspect
            * Progressive Disclosure Alternatives
            * Anticipated Conversion Elevate

[Input Data] Analytics knowledge: [PASTE DATA OR ATTACH AS A FILE]
Time interval: [DATE RANGE] 
Enterprise context: [BUSINESS GOALS] 
Viewers: [STAKEHOLDER TYPE]
[Goal Description] Remodel technical Website positioning knowledge into client-friendly enterprise insights displaying impression on enterprise outcomes. 
[Task Description] Convert Website positioning metrics into compelling enterprise narrative. Translate enhancements into income impression, market beneficial properties, or acquisition advantages with clear cause-and-effect relationships. 
[Output Format] * Govt Abstract (3 sentences) * Key Enterprise Wins * Income/Visitors Affect * Market Place * ROI Demonstration * Subsequent Steps * Visible Solutions

Competitor URLs: [PASTE URL STRUCTURE OR ATTACH CSV EXPORT]
Competitor area: [INSERT DOMAIN]
Your present options: [LIST YOUR FEATURES]
[Goal Description] Analyze competitor web site structure to determine product options/instruments; output as characteristic listing with worth propositions.
[Task Description] Extract competitor options from URL construction and web site structure. Establish distinctive functionalities, instruments, calculators, or interactive components. Map every to doubtless worth proposition and person want.
[Output Format] Function stock:
* Function Identify | URL Sample | Worth Proposition | Consumer Want | Implementation Complexity | Precedence Rating
Be aware: Validate findings manually.

[Input Data] Month-to-month Website positioning metrics: [PASTE COMPREHENSIVE DATA — TRAFFIC, RANKINGS, CONVERSIONS — OR ATTACH AS A FILE] 
Earlier interval: [PASTE PREVIOUS PERIOD DATA — OR ATTACH AS A FILE] 
Marketing campaign actions: [LIST KEY ACTIVITIES] Finances: [AMOUNT IF RELEVANT] 
[Goal Description] Create govt abstract highlighting ROI and strategic wins from month-to-month Website positioning efficiency. 
[Task Description] Synthesize Website positioning knowledge into concise govt abstract specializing in enterprise impression. Emphasize C-suite metrics: income affect, market share, aggressive wins, and effectivity beneficial properties.
[Output Format] * Efficiency Headline (one impactful assertion) * ROI Spotlight * High 3 Strategic Wins * Key Metrics Dashboard (5 most vital) * Aggressive Place Replace * Subsequent Month Focus * Funding Advice

[Input Data] Website positioning technique: [PASTE YOUR STRATEGY]
Audience: [C-SUITE ROLE/DEPARTMENT]
Presentation size: [NUMBER OF SLIDES]
Enterprise priorities: [LIST TOP PRIORITIES]
[Goal Description] Remodel Website positioning technique into C-suite presentation specializing in enterprise worth and aggressive benefit.
[Task Description] Convert Website positioning technique into govt presentation emphasizing enterprise impression and strategic alignment. Take away technical jargon, deal with outcomes over techniques, create clear narrative from downside to resolution to outcomes.
[Output Format] Slide-by-slide define:
* Slide Title | Key Message | Supporting Information | Visible Advice | Speaker Notes