HomeSEOOpen Source Versus Proprietary Platforms

Open Source Versus Proprietary Platforms

The Core Internet Vitals Know-how Report by the open supply HTTPArchive neighborhood ranks content material administration methods by how nicely they carry out on Google’s Core Internet Vitals (CWV). The November 2025 information exhibits a big hole between platforms with the best ranked CMS scoring 84.87% of websites passing CWV, whereas the bottom ranked CMS scored 46.28%.

What’s of curiosity this month is that the highest three Core Internet Vitals champs are all closed supply proprietary platforms whereas the open supply methods have been on the backside of the pack.

Significance Of Core Internet Vitals

Core Internet Vitals (CWV) are metrics created by Google to measure how briskly, steady, and responsive an internet site feels to customers. Web sites that load shortly and reply easily hold guests engaged and have a tendency to carry out higher by way of gross sales, reads, and add impressions, whereas websites that fall brief frustrate customers, enhance bounce charges, and carry out much less nicely for enterprise objectives. CWV scores replicate the standard of the consumer expertise and the way a web site performs below real-world circumstances.

How the Knowledge Is Collected

The CWV Know-how Report combines two public datasets.

The Chrome UX Report (CrUX) makes use of information from Chrome customers who choose in to share efficiency statistics as they browse. This displays how actual customers expertise web sites.
The HTTP Archive runs lab-based assessments that analyze how websites are constructed and whether or not they comply with efficiency greatest practices.

Collectively, the report I generated supplies a snapshot of how every content material administration system performs on Core Internet Vitals.

Rating By November 2025 CWV Rating

Duda Is The Quantity One Ranked Core Internet Vitals Champ

Duda ranked first in November 2025, with 84.87% of websites constructed on the platform delivering a passing Core Internet Vitals rating. It was the one platform on this comparability the place greater than 4 out of 5 websites achieved a great CWV rating. Duda has persistently ranked #1 for Core Internet Vitals for a number of years now.

Wix Ranked #2

Wix ranked second, with 74.86% of websites passing CWV. Whereas it trailed Duda by ten share factors, Wix was nearly 4 share factors forward of the third place CMS on this comparability.

Squarespace Ranked #3

Squarespace ranked third, at 70.39%. Its CWV move fee positioned it nearer to Wix than to Drupal, sustaining a transparent place within the high three ranked publishing platforms.

Drupal Ranked #4

Drupal ranked fourth, with 63.27% of websites passing CWV. That rating put Drupal in the course of the comparability, beneath the three personal label web site builders. It is a curious scenario as a result of the underside three CMS’s on this comparability are all open supply platforms.

Joomla Ranked #5

Joomla ranked fifth, at 56.92%. Whereas greater than half of Joomla websites handed CWV, the platform remained nicely behind the highest performers.

WordPress Ranked Final at place #6

WordPress ranked final, with 46.28% of websites passing Core Internet Vitals. Fewer than half of WordPress websites met the CWV thresholds on this snapshot. What’s notable about WordPress’s poor rating is that it lags behind the fifth place Joomla by about ten share factors. So not solely is WordPress ranked final on this comparability, it’s decisively final.

Why the Numbers Matter

Core Internet Vitals scores translate into measurable variations in how customers expertise web sites. Platforms on the high of the rating ship quicker and extra steady experiences throughout a bigger share of websites, whereas platforms on the backside expose a better variety of customers to slower and fewer responsive pages. The hole between Duda and WordPress within the November 2025 comparability was practically 40 share factors, 38.59 share factors.

Whereas an argument could be made that the WordPress ecosystem of plugins and themes could also be in charge for the low CWV scores, the very fact stays that WordPress is lifeless final on this comparability. Maybe WordPress must grow to be extra proactive about how themes and plugins carry out, resembling provide you with requirements that they’ve to satisfy to be able to achieve a efficiency certification. Which may trigger plugin and theme makers to prioritize efficiency.

Do Content material Administration Programs Matter For Rating?

I’ve talked about this earlier than and can repeat it this month. There have been discussions and debates about whether or not the selection of content material administration system impacts search rankings. Some argue that plugins and suppleness make WordPress simpler to rank in Google. However the truth is that personal platforms like Duda, Wix, and Squarespace have all targeted on offering aggressive website positioning functionalities that automate a variety of technical website positioning duties.

Some folks insist that Core Internet Vitals make a big contribution to their rankings and I imagine them. However usually, the very fact is that CWV efficiency is a minor rating issue.

However, efficiency nonetheless issues for outcomes which might be instant and measurable, resembling consumer expertise and conversions, which signifies that the November 2025 HTTPArchive Know-how Report shouldn’t be ignored.

The HTTPArchive report is out there right here however it is going to be going away and changed very quickly. I’ve tried the brand new report and, except I missed one thing, it lacks a solution to constrain the report by date.

Featured Picture by Shutterstock/Pink Fox studio

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular